MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 10644: Impact of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery on Myocardial Perfusion Assessed by Ultrafast Power Doppler: A Human Proof-of-Concept Study

2021· article· en· W3217389167 on OpenAlexaff
Minh B. Nguyen, Naiyuan Zhang, Luc Mertens, David J. Barron, Jérôme Baranger, Olivier Villemain

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicinePerfusionCardiopulmonary bypassBlood flowBypass surgeryArtery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Inadequate myocardial coronary perfusion is a major cause of cardiac dysfunction in several clinical settings including congenital heart disease and cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (CPB). Blood flow to the myocardium (i.e. coronary perfusion) is primarily controlled by the coronary microvasculature (vessels < 500 μm) which plays a key part in coronary perfusion autoregulation. Until recently, direct quantitative coronary perfusion assessment had been infeasible due to limitations in spatial and/or temporal resolution of clinical imaging modalities. The study objective is to assess if ultrafast ultrasound-mediated power Doppler (PD) can approximate changes in myocardial perfusion in humans. Methods: We used a 6.9 MHz linear array probe connected to a programmable ultrafast ultrasound scanner (Verasonics Vantage®). We included 7 neonates with transposition of the great arteries (TGA) and acquired epicardial ultrafast acquisitions immediately before and after CPB (arterial switch operation) via open chest. The acquisitions were acquired at 2000 fps (PRF=10000Hz, 5 sources). Tissue clutter was separated from coronary signals with a sliding spatiotemporal filter. PD was measured as a representative of blood volume that scales with hematocrit. Fractional moving blood volume (FMBV) was calculated to normalize the PD signal: mean PD divided by the PD of the ventricular blood pool, a region with 100% vascular amplitude. Results and Conclusions: The FMBV post-operatively increased by a factor of two compared to pre-operative assessment, a reflection of hyperemia. These values returned to baseline on repeat assessment prior to discharge. Our findings suggest that ultrafast PD is a reliable tool in approximating changes in myocardial perfusion in the operating room and beyond. Thus, ultrafast power Doppler can be utilized to quantitatively assess the impact of CPB on coronary perfusion in humans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular and Diving-Related ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207