“Tree Rings” (Album Design Competition, Breath & Being Honourable Mention.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The design of this album cover evokes a sense of peace, wonder and reflection. This intimate look at the centre of a tree and its rings allows the viewer to reflect and connect with their own natural state of being. This self-reflective and vulnerable state that the viewer feels is just like the tree rings that are featured on the cover, they are hidden from view until we allow ourselves to open up and share with the world. In this album Roya invites her listeners to open up with her and share some intimate moments as they join her on this musical journey and get to know her. The design highlights that the cracks and hardships in our lives make us who we are and helps create and shape our very own state of being. This feeling of calm and connection are enhanced by the colour palette. The soft and light colours leave a sense of joy and comfort and allows the viewer to feel safe and content and will leave them feeling comfortable enough to open up and enjoy the connection and intimacy that comes from the album. Viewers are invited to sit back and enjoy as well as get up and dance as the intimate and deep conversations unfold throughout the album as they become a part of the forest. Department: Design Studies Faculty Mentor: Constanza Pacher
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.179 | 0.035 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".