MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3217399084 · doi:10.1002/1873-3468.14243

PACS‐1 contains distinct motifs for nuclear‐cytoplasmic transport and interacts with the RNA‐binding protein PTBP1 in the nucleus and cytosol

2021· article· en· W3217399084 on OpenAlexafffund
Steven M. Trothen, Rong Xuan Zang, Antony Lurie, Jimmy D. Dikeakos

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNuclear Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNuclear transportImportinNuclear localization sequenceNuclear export signalNLSNuclear proteinNucleoporinPolypyrimidine tract-binding proteinCell biologyNuclear poreRNA-binding proteinRNACell nucleusCytoplasmCytosolTransport proteinRanProtein targetingBiologyHeterogeneous ribonucleoprotein particleBiochemistryGeneTranscription factorMembrane protein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phosphofurin acidic cluster sorting protein 1 (PACS-1) is canonically a cytosolic trafficking protein, yet recent reports have described nuclear roles for PACS-1. Herein, we sought to define the nuclear transport mechanism of PACS-1. We demonstrate that PACS-1 nucleocytoplasmic trafficking is dependent on its interaction with the nuclear transport receptors importin alpha 5 and exportin 1. PACS-1 nuclear entry and exit are defined by a nuclear localization signal (NLS, residues 311-318) and nuclear export signal (NES3, residues 366-375). Mutation of the PACS-1 NLS and NES3 altered the localization of a complex formed between PACS-1 and an RNA-binding protein, polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1. Overall, we identify the nuclear localization mechanism of PACS-1 and highlight a potential role for PACS-1 in RNA-binding protein trafficking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicNuclear Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207