MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3217461843 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-151467

Elucidating the Importance and Regulation of Key Enhancers for Human MEIS1 Expression

2021· article· en· W3217461843 on OpenAlexaff
Xining Yang, Ping Xiang, Leo Escano, Ishpreet Dhillon, Edith Schneider, Jack Clemans-Gibbon, Wei Wei, Jasper Wong, Simon Xufeng Wang, Gregg B. Morin, Pamela A. Hoodless, Martin Hirst, Aly Karsan, Florian Kuchenbauer, R. Keith Humphries, A. MAUREEN ROUHI

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnhancerBiologyCRISPRCas9GeneticsIntronEnhancer trapGeneMolecular biologyTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Myeloid ecotropic virus insertion site 1 (MEIS1) is essential for normal hematopoiesis and is deregulated in a large subset of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by yet unknown mechanisms. We previously identified 3 candidate enhancer regions: enhancer region 1 (E1) at -2 kb upstream; enhancer region 2 (E2) at +10.6 kb downstream inside intron 6; and enhancer region 3 (E3) +140 kb downstream of the translation start site. In the current study, we utilized CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing to further characterize these enhancers in a human AML cell line and identify the key transcription factors (TFs) associated with their function. To efficiently track MEIS1 expression levels, a GFP reporter, a P2A self-cleaving peptide tag and a hemagglutinin tag at its translation start site was introduced in a MEIS1 high expressing human AML cell line, U937. Then we introduced random mutations (Indels) along the MEIS1 locus utilizing a CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing vector system in mono-allelic MEIS1-GFP-tagged U937 cells with special focus on the previously identified enhancer regions to find the key sequences important to the function of the MEIS1 enhancer regions. Two targeted regions yielding the highest proportion of GFP - cells corresponded to the E2 enhancer region within intron 6 and were referred to as E2.1 and E2.2. Using chromosome conformation capture (3C) assay, we detected a significantly decreased interaction (p=0.0022) between the promoter and the intron 6 region surrounding the E2 region in E2.2 targeted cells compared to the parental cells. Moreover, our data indicated that the DNA sequence within E2.2 is highly critical to this region's enhancer function which is further influenced by the larger genomic region surrounding the E2.1 gRNA targeted site. To identify TFs binding to the E2 region, we further scrutinized the E2.2 indel region for loss of TF binding sites. We performed TF prediction analysis and performed a protein pull down-mass spectrometry experiment to identify TF candidates. The overlap yielded a list of 7 TFs, each of which we targeted via CRISPR/Cas9. Reduction in GFP levels was only observed for FLI1 locus targeting but not for the other 6 TFs. Concordant reduction in MEIS1 and FLI1 levels were confirmed by immunoblotting. Additionally, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) followed by quantitative PCR revealed significant FLI1 enrichment at the promoter and at 3 sites surrounding the E2.2 region (p=0.0004) compared to 4 control regions scattered along the MEIS1 locus. Given a previous study indicating MEIS1 upregulation of FLI1 in normal hematopoiesis, we hypothesised that a positive feedback loop may exist between FLI1 and MEIS1 in AML. Since MEIS1 levels are frequently elevated in normal karyotype AML (CN-AML), we used the murine Hoxa9/Meis1 AML model as a surrogate for CN-AML and performed Meis1 ChIP-seq analysis. We detected direct Meis1 binding to the intronic region of the mouse Fli1 gene as well as other ETS factor loci, in Hoxa9/Meis1 cells. To better understand the clinical relevance of FLI1 in AML, we analyzed the Beat AML dataset. High FLI1 transcript levels correlated with adverse overall survival in CN-AML (p=0.044). Additionally, we observed a trend towards worse outcome with high FLI1 in the NPM1-mutated CN-AML subtype (p=0.069). We also observed a similar correlation in CN-AML for another ETS factor, ELF1, which we had previously shown to bind and upregulate MEIS1 expression in AML, suggesting a broader unrecognized role for ETS factors in AML. In summary, we have developed a rapid flow cytometry-based readout for the fine dissection and characterization of the cis-regulatory elements and associated TFs critical for MEIS1 transcription via CRISPR-Cas9 genetic manipulation. Our study revealed FLI1 as the candidate key regulator of MEIS1 expression and a positive correlation between FLI1 mRNA levels and worse overall survival in MEIS1-high AML subgroups. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→