MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 10733: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Characteristics Including Feature Tracking in a Multi-Center Pediatric Study of Atypical Myocarditis

2021· article· en· W3217590390 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Caris, Jenna Schauer, Lamia Ait-Alì, Ravi Ashwath, Sowmya Balasubramanian, Nadine Choueiter, Jason Christensen, Matthew Cornicelli, Juan Carlos Muniz, David Parra, Edythe Tham, Sathish Chikkabyrappa, Luciana Young, Brian D. Soriano, Sujatha Buddhe

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Immunology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyocarditisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Atypical myocarditis, presenting as isolated chest pain, elevated troponin and preserved cardiac output in childhood is rare. Beyond small volume single center case series, limited data are reported on CMR characteristics at initial presentation and follow up. Methods: This is a pediatric multi-center retrospective study. Patients with chest pain and elevated cardiac troponin who underwent an echo and CMR within 30 days of each other were included. Clinical, echo and CMR parameters were collected at presentation and follow up. CMR global longitudinal strain (GLS) was performed with feature tracking technology (TomTec). Cases were divided into CMR myocarditis positive (Myo+) and CMR myocarditis negative (Myo-) based on Lake Louise criteria. Findings were compared to 19 age matched controls. Results: A total of 108 cases were included (88 Myo+ and 20 Myo-). Majority were male (88%) with average age of 15.6 ± 2.1 years. Median troponin was 13 (0.18-260.1 ng/mL), median BNP was 270.8 (12-3949 pg/ml). Abnormal ECG findings were present in 79% at presentation. While CMR LVEF did not differ between cases (56 ± 9%) and controls (60 ± 4%, p 0.06), GLS was significantly worse in cases (-16.2 ± 2.7%) compared to controls (-19.2 ± 2.1%, p <0.001). Unlike LVEF, GLS was significantly worse in Myo+ (-15.7 ± 2.8%) compared to Myo- cases (-18.0 ± 1.3%, p < 0.001). Fifty-four subjects had follow up data with 35 repeat CMRs. Median follow up was 204 (30-944) days. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) persisted in 82% of the Myo+ cases. Of the cases with abnormal GLS at presentation, 77% had persistent LGE. At follow up, 14% of cases were on heart failure medications, 33% had abnormal GLS and 39% had abnormal LVEF (<55%). Neither treatment with steroids or IVIG at presentation nor LGE on initial or follow up CMR were associated with the need for heart failure medications or persistent symptoms at follow up. Conclusions: In atypical myocarditis, CMR GLS can help differentiate between Myo+ and Myo- cases. Abnormal CMR GLS at presentation has higher association with persistence of LGE at follow up, irrespective of type of treatment. Future studies are needed to identify other characteristics that predict persistently abnormal findings important to clinical management and prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicViral Infections and Immunology Research→French-language works237,207→