Abstract 11384: Discharge and De-Escalation After VAD Implant in Children with Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Multi-Center Quality Improvement Initiative
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Children with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) are increasingly bridged to heart transplant (Tx) with intracorporeal continuous flow ventricular assist devices (VADs), but there continues to be variability in hospital discharge. We sought to assess the impact of a quality improvement (QI) project promoting hospital discharge in pediatric VAD patients with DCM. Methods: Patients enrolled at sites participating in the Discharge and De-Escalation QI project of the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) registry were eligible. Patients with a HeartWare (HVAD) or HeartMate3 (HM3) VAD, implanted between April 2018 and February 2021, were included. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared before and after the QI initiative, which targeted team and family expectations, was implemented in November 2019. Results: There were 85 patients (75%) with DCM and/or myocarditis who were included in this study (median age 14 years; median weight 57.1 kg; 67% male). Among 57 patients in the baseline group, 56% (n=32) were discharged with a mean post-implant hospital length of stay (LOS) of 36 days and 44% (n=25) underwent Tx during index VAD admission, with a mean of 52 days on device. There were 28 patients in the intervention group; 64% (n=18) were discharged with a mean LOS of 45 days, while 29% (n=8) patients underwent Tx during index VAD admission, with a mean of 44 hospital days on device. There was no significant difference in the frequency of hospital discharge or in hospital LOS between groups. Conclusions: Pediatric centers discharged just over half of DCM patients supported on an HVAD or HM3, with nearly one third of patients undergoing transplant during the index VAD admission. The QI intervention did not significantly alter the discharge rate. Further work is required to understand practice variation between centers with respect to Tx listing and organ acceptance for children on intracorporeal continuous flow VADs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".