MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3217681994 · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2021-ioc.296

324 Lifetime prevalence and one-year incidence of sport-related concussion in adolescents

2021· article· en· W3217681994 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jocelyn McCallum, Carolyn A. Emery, Paul Eliason, Kathryn Schneider, Amanda M. Black

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsHotchkiss Brain InstituteSpinal Cord Injury AlbertaAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcussionIncidence (geometry)MedicineConfidence intervalDemographyPhysical therapyPoison controlInjury preventionPediatricsInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Understanding the burden of concussion among youth is important to quantify the effectiveness of community-based concussion prevention strategies. Objective To determine the lifetime prevalence and one-year incidence of sport-related concussion among male and female high school students (ages 14–19 years) in Alberta, Canada. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting High schools (Alberta, Canada). Participants High school students (n=2029; 958 male, 1048 female, 23 identified as ‘other’; ages 14–19 years) from 24 schools. Assessment of Risk Factors High school students completed a web-based survey during class (October 2018 – March 2019). Students identified the top three sports for participation in the past year. Main Outcome Measurements Self-reported lifetime prevalence and one-year incidence of sport-related concussion were described by sex and sport with 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusted for cluster by school. Results Most high school students (1763/2029, 86.69%) reported participating in a sport/recreational activity in the past year. Of the 1,971 students (97.14%) answering the question about lifetime concussion history, 264/923 males [28.60% (95% CI, 21.97–36.31)], 227/1027 females [22.10% (95% CI, 17.96–26.89)], and 3/21 ‘other’ students [14.29% (95% CI, 2.22–55.05)] reported one concussion or more. 131/923 males [14.19% (95% CI, 10.28–19.27)], 99/1027 females [9.64% (95% CI, 7.49–12.33)], and 1/21 ‘other’ students [4.76% (95% CI, 0.46–35.28)] reported at least one concussion in the past year. For males, hockey [32/186, [Incidence Proportion(IP):17.20/100 students/year (95% CI, 12.48–23.23)], lacrosse [4/29, IP: 13.79/100 students/year (95% CI, 5.27–31.52)], and rugby [8/61, IP: 13.11/100 students/year (95% CI, 6.02–26.24)] had the highest rates of concussion. For females, ringette [4/21, IP: 19.05/100 students/year (95% CI, 9.92–33.46)], rugby [9/58, IP: 15.52/100 students/year (95% CI, 8.04–27.84)], and wrestling [3/25, IP: 12.00/100 students/year (95% CI, 3.68–32.76)] had the highest rates. Conclusions 1 in 4 high school students report one or more sport-related concussions in their lifetime, and 1 in 9 students reported one or more concussions in the past year. Prevention strategies aimed at reducing concussion burden are crucial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.730
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoster presentationsSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207