Persistence of Uranium in Old and Cold Subpermafrost Groundwater Indicated by Linking <sup>234</sup>U-<sup>235</sup>U-<sup>238</sup>U, Groundwater Ages, and Hydrogeochemistry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Uranium (U) contamination in groundwater from geogenic sources affects water quality globally. Here, we use a multifaceted isotopic and geochemical approach to elucidate U sources and controls on geogenic U release to groundwater and surface water at a prospective subarctic gold deposit in Yukon, Canada, that is characterized by permafrost, fractured bedrock, and cold (<2 °C) groundwater. X-ray absorption spectroscopy, sequential extractions, and micro X-ray fluorescence mapping show extensive subsurface oxidation and solid-phase U present in its hexavalent and mobile form. Limited 238U/235U isotope fractionation and predominance of U(VI) in rocks suggest U(VI) sorption–desorption is the main driver of U mobilization. Groundwater U concentrations are appreciable (median 38 μg/L, range 1.2–535 μg/L) and are explained by high-alkalinity, Ca-rich groundwater produced from oxidative weathering of sulfide and carbonate-mineralized structures around the deposit. Minor 238U/235U isotope fractionation in groundwater indicates that limited U(VI) reduction occurs beneath permafrost despite groundwater redox conditions below Fe(III) and S(VI) reduction, and groundwater ages inferred from 3H and 14C to be on the order of thousands of years. The complexation of U as uranyl–calcium–carbonate complexes and the resilience of these complexes to U(VI) reduction contributes to high U(VI) mobility under cold groundwater conditions. This study provides insight into processes and time scales of U transport in subarctic groundwater at a pivotal time when hydrogeochemical changes may be anticipated in cold regions worldwide due to permafrost degradation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".