MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3217802454 · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.32607.98722

Emotion Socialization and Regulation Supporting Adolescent Psychosocial Adjustment to the Covid-19 Pandemic

2021· dissertation· en· W3217802454 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Vanessa Sánchez Martín

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPandemicSocializationPsychosocialCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PsychologyDevelopmental psychologyPolitical scienceMedicinePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emotion-related parenting practices are expected to influence adolescent psychosocial adjustment via the development of emotion regulation. However, the role of emotion regulation strategies as the mechanism through which differences in adjustment occurs has yet to be assessed. Additionally, the role and function of these parenting behaviours in the transition to adolescence remains unclear, despite being a potential source of resilience. Questionnaire data from the first 2 assessments of a 5-year annual longitudinal study as well as an additional timepoint added in response to the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic (May-June 2020) was used to assess relevant variables. Emotion-related parenting practices were assessed at Time 1 of data collection, adolescent emotion regulation strategies were assessed at Time 2, and adolescent adjustment was assessed at Time 3 of data collection. Participants were parent-adolescent dyads (N=131), with adolescents aged 11-12 at Time 1. Three multiple mediation analyses were used to evaluate whether four emotion regulation strategies (Reappraisal, Engagement, Rumination, and Suppression) mediated the relationship between three emotion-related parenting practices (Emotion Coaching, Acceptance, and Uncertainty), and adolescent adjustment to the Covid-19 pandemic. An additional analysis was conducted to assess any sex differences in these relationships. Results showed that while both parent’s Emotion Coaching and Uncertainty influenced adolescent’s adjustment, Emotion Regulation Strategies did not mediate this relationship. Emotion regulation strategies do not appear to the mechanism through which emotion-related parenting practices influence adolescent psychosocial adjustment, however suggested alternatives such as emotional lability are explored in the discussion. The present study also highlights the role of parental Emotion Coaching in the development of adolescent psychosocial adjustment or resilience, including to a universal stressor such as the Covid-19 pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207