Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nathalie StephensGuelph, OntarioActivism/ActivismeBazilli, Susan. A Brief Guide to International Human Rights Law for Canadian Advocates. Canadian Woman Studies/les cahiers de la femme, Special Issue: 2000: Eradicating Poverty and in the 21st Century, vol. 20, no. 3 (Fall 2000), pp. 64-71.This article serves as a guide to international human rights law for Canadian advocates. By providing a brief history of violence against women as an international human rights issue, and an example of how Canadians have used the UN treaties, the author attempts to demystify the legal instruments and organizational mechanisms available to activists. The essay concludes with suggestions for action. (MW)Canadian Women's March Committee. It's Time for Change! The World March of 2000. Canadian Woman Studies/les cahiers de la femme, Special Issue: 2000: Eradicating Poverty and in the 21st Century, vol. 20, no. 3 (Fall 2000), pp. 21-23.This article relates the steps that were taken in the year 2000 to create the Canadian Women's March, and the need for this March to counteract a global tide of inequality for and injustice towards women. Demands to government, especially in areas of poverty and violence, are outlined. (MW)Cockburn, Cynthia. Women In Black: Being Able To Say Neither/Nor. Canadian Woman Studies/les cahiers de la femme, Special Issue: in Conflict Zones, vol. 19, no. 4 (Winter 2000), pp. 7-10.As a member of the activist group Women in Black, the author of this essay participated in a demonstration in 1999 to oppose the NATO bombing in the Balkans. Using this experience as an example, she describes a process of polarization and homogenization in politics which makes protesting difficult. She believes that in the peace effort, living with ambiguity and without answers is crucial. (MW)George, Glynis. Violence and Poverty on the 'Rock.' Can Feminists Make a Difference? Canadian Woman Studies/les cahiers de la femme, Special Issue: 2000: Eradicating Poverty and in the 21st Century, vol. 20, no. 3 (Fall 2000), pp. 181-185.This paper focusses on the involvement of feminists in a government initiative, the Provincial Strategy Against Violence, to respond to violence and poverty in Newfoundland and Labrador, undertaken in 1993. She describes the difficulty of establishing programs in the context of government restructuring and fiscal restraint. (MW)Hewitt-White, Caitlin. Direct Action against Poverty: Feminist Reflections on the Ontario Coalition Against Poverty Demonstration, June 2000. Canadian Woman Studies/les cahiers de la femme, Special Issue: 2000: Eradicating Poverty and in the 21st Century, vol. 20, no. 3 (Fall 2000), pp. 186-190.The author uses a feminist anti-oppression analysis to discuss gender within the Ontario Coalition Against Poverty protest at Queen's Park in Toronto, Ontario. She expands her discussion to inclusivity and empowerment at protests more generally. She believes that the decision-making structures of protests must be decentralized to ensure that the power does not stay within the hands of those with pre-established privilege. (MW)Jay, Suzanne. Columbia Anti-Violence Workers Recommendations for Change. Canadian Woman Studies/les cahiers de la femme, Special Issue: 2000: Eradicating Poverty and in the 21st Century, vol. 20, no. 3 (Fall 2000), pp. 160-164.In September 1999, feminist frontline anti-violence workers met to determine the critical issues related to violence against women in British Columbia. This essay outlines the recommendations that emerged from that weekend. (MW)Lawrence, Bonita. Harvesting Rights and White Resistance. Atlantis. Special Issue: Whose Canada Is It?, vol. 24, no. 2 (Spring 2000), pp. 153-156.This article suggests that Aboriginal harvesting, which represents the core of cultural regeneration, is the central focus of not only white racist assaults, but also provincial and federal attacks on Native autonomy and sovereignty as well. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.745 | 0.487 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".