MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 130: Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolization in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Acute Ischemic Stroke Population: Incidence and Patterns of Prophylaxis

2012· article· en· W32370700 on OpenAlexaff
G. Logan Douds, Anne S. Hellkamp, DaWai Olson, Gregg C. Fonarow, Eric E. Smith, Lee H. Schwamm, Kevin M. Cockroft

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsHotchkiss Brain InstituteUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Deep veinAtrial fibrillationThrombosisPopulationInternal medicineAmbulatoryVenous thrombosisIncidence (geometry)SurgeryPediatricsCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective. Venous thomboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolus (PE), represents a serious complication in hospitalized ischemic stroke patients. This study was undertaken to determine the incidence and patterns of prophylaxis for VTE in the GWTG-Stroke population. Methods. From 323,363 adult ischemic stroke patients enrolled in GWTG-Stroke, patients who were not admitted, had their stroke as an inpatient, died or discharged by day 2, ambulatory by day 2, ambulatory status unknown, VTE prophylaxis contraindicated, and comfort care by day 2 were excluded leaving 149,916 patients from 1,259 sites, of whom 136,432/149,916 (91%) had information on DVT/PE occurrence. Analysis of patient variables and site characteristics were performed in relation to reported administration of VTE prophylaxis. Multivariable models were constructed based on demographics, initial NIHSS, medical history, receipt of tPA or other therapy, and hospital characteristics. Results. The overall rate of DVT/PE was 3.01% (4,100/136,432). Excluding sites with VTE rates = 0% or >50% reduced this rate to 2.81% (3,408/121,276). The overall rate of VTE prophylaxis in the analysis cohort was 93% (139,476/149,916). Site prophylaxis rates were median 95% (25 th -75 th percentiles, 89%-98%) and ranged from 17% (1 site) to 100% (101 sites). Factors associated with increased likelihood of VTE prophylaxis in the multivariable model included history of atrial fibrillation/flutter (OR 1.50; 95% CI 1.42-1.59), receipt of IV (OR 1.24; 95% CI1.15-1.35) or IA tPA (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.13-1.59), and admission to an academic hospital (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.44-1.97). Increasing age (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.94-0.96) and black race (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.86-0.98), as well as history of peripheral vascular disease (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.78-0.90), diabetes (OR 0.92; 95% CI:0.88-0.95), or prior stroke/TIA (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.87-0.97) were associated with lower likelihood of prophylaxis. Patients receiving care in the Midwest region were less likely to receive prophylaxis compared to other regions (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.61-0.88). Conclusions: Despite a high overall rate of prophylaxis, DVT/PE continue to occur in approximately 3% of GWTG-Stroke patients. Reported rates of VTE prophylaxis differ among hospitals by region, and among different patients by age, race, and medical co-morbidities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207