Research on the Factors Influencing the Frequency of Intended Wrongdoings Behavior of the managers/RECHERCHE SUR LES FACTEURS INFLUANT LA FREQUENCE DU COMPORTEMENT MALFAITEUR VOULU DES DIRECTEURS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: After doing some research on behaviors of managers, author found out that there exists a kind of wrongdoings among managers, belonging to Irrational which is different from Rational and Limited person. It can be indicated from research that wrongdoings of managers are mainly impacted by four factors, which are go-as-you-please attitude, personal preferences, managing rights and ability of managers. There are some related strict conditions such as decision making ability, desire-controlling ability, right restricting ability as well as morality restricting ability. Key words: irrational behavior, wrongdoings, frequencies, influencing factors Resume: A la suite des recherches sur des comportements des directeurs, l'auteur a trouve qu'il y a parmi eux une sorte de malfaiteur voulu appartenant au comportement qui est different de l'homme et de l'homme rationnel limite. Il resulte des recherches que les comportements malfaiteurs voulus des directeurs sont principalement influences par quatre facteurs: attitude d'agir a son gre, preferences personnelles, pouvoirs de direction et leur capacite. Il existe des conditions strictement concernees telles que les capacites de la prise de decision rationnelle, de controle, de la restriction du pouvoir ainsi que de la restriction de la morale. Mots-Cles: irrationnel, malfaits voulus, frequence, facteurs influants 1. INTRODUCTION traditional Economies supposed people as rational person. Nobel Prize winner, American economist Herbert Arthur Simon put forward hypothesis of limited in his book called behavior in 1947. He claimed that intelligent rational of economic should be replaced by practical behavior, and he thought that there were two factors affecting managers' behavior: one is external environment of managers; other is limits in managers themselves; William Baleite stated that there are limit person and subjectivity from psychological aspect, therefore, people are irrational persons. After doing some research on behaviors of managers, author found out that there exists a kind of wrongdoings among managers, belonging to Irrational which is different from Rational and Limited person. For example, in 2005 managing department of one park digged lake out and put on a piece of membrane, separating lake from underground. This is obviously a mistake that will destroy ecological environment. Also, this is a mistake that lacks common sense and for those who have certain knowledge of environment protection and ecological protection will know this is a wrongdoing. However, managing department even continued making same mistakes and didn't admit mistake. What kind of phenomenon is this behavior? author thinks that it belongs to the wrongdoings behavior and this kind of managers belong to the wrongdoers. The wrongdoings behavior of managers means that managers know that their isn't fitful for requirement of rational citizens, values admitted by public, moral regulations and national laws, but still take some wrong measures or management behaviors. This is an irrational For instance, some bribees know that bribes are against law but they still do bribes, which are considered as intended wrongdoings behavior. Managers' intended wrongdoers means managers who always have intended wrongdoings behavior. After clarifying related concepts, author does some research on factors that influence frequency of wrongdoings of managers. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".