MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W326250337 · doi:10.1177/070674370605100209

Book Review: Child Psychiatry: Basic Child Psychiatry

2006· article· en· W326250337 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Nasreen Roberts

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChild and adolescent psychiatryPsychiatryContext (archaeology)Economic shortageMental healthPsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Child Psychiatry Basic Child Psychiatry Philip Barker. Oxford (UK): Blackwell Science Limited; 2004 248 p. CANS52.95. Reviewer rating: Good At a time when there is an acute shortage of child and adolescent psychiatrists in Canada and the rest of the world, those who practise or are training to practise family medicine or general adult psychiatry increasingly find themselves having to assess and manage children and adolescents with psychiatric problems. Considering that the cumulative prevalence rate of psychiatric disorders among children and adolescents is about 5% to 22%, there is indeed an urgent need to educate primary care physicians, pediatricians, general psychiatrists, and health workers to enable them to recognize and manage some of these disorders. As the title suggests, this is an introduction to the basics of child psychiatry. The book is divided into 23 short chapters that encompass all diagnostic groups in child psychiatry, starting with a brief review of developmental factors and ending with one on prevention. All chapters are well organized and written clearly and concisely with most salient and current references at the end of the book for those wishing to further pursue any of the topics. Chapter 4, on epidemiology, gives a brief description of major research into incidence and prevalence of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders. It provides a context in which to view each of the diagnostic groups. Chapter 5 Assessing Children and Their Families is a tour de force. At 19 pages, it is the longest chapter. It virtually walks the reader step by step through the interview and assessment process with sample questions to elicit information, strategies for maximizing attainment of rapport, and comprehensive history taking. The chapter ends with a useful grid for formulating the information of predisposers, precipitators, perperuators, and protectors in the 4 domains of constitutional, temperamental, physical, and environmental factors. This chapter is a testimony to the author's clinical experience and expertise in direct care of children and their families. There are 12 chapters dedicated to major disorders, including a chapter on reaction to stress. These chapters are organized systematically with definitions and prevalence, causes, descriptions, assessment and treatment, and outcome for each disorder. Chapter 17, Mind Body Relationship, takes dichotomous concepts and thoughtfully demonstrates their interdependence and circularity, helping to divert attempts from linear causality and solutions to more appropriate multidimensional thinking. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0770.054

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of PsychiatrySame topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207