MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W326602277

FAITH AND ORDER IN A POSTMODERN WORLD : A RESPONSE

2007· article· en· W326602277 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Root

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPragmatism in Philosophy and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaithPostmodernismIrishModernityTheme (computing)HistoryReligious studiesOrder (exchange)SociologyTheologyPhilosophyLawPolitical scienceEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A snapshot of the postmodern situation: I am responding to a paper by a Methodist theologian from Tonga, who now teaches in Aus-tralia, and an American Orthodox theologian teaching at a Catholic University in New York City. I am myself a Lutheran, born, raised, and resident in the South of the United States, but have also lived ten years in France and am of French-Canadian, Irish, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Scotch-Irish, Dutch ancestry. One of my great-grandfathers was the president of the Burman Baptist Seminary, now the Myanmar Institute of Christian Theology, in Insein, Myanmar. One grandfather was the principal of a high school in Bayamón, Puerto Rico. A cousin of one grandmother was a Roman Catholic priest in the diocese of Springfield, Massachusetts. Heterogeneity in a nutshell. II. The Theme Faith and Order in the Post-Modern World. " Every aspect of the phrase gives one pause. First, “Faith and Order. ” The Faith and Order Movement came into existence early in the 20th century to address the differences over faith and order that divide the church. These divisions and the disputes are not new. The problem that sets the Faith and Order agenda predated modernity and will, short of a new outpouring of the Spirit, be around when post-modernity is a footnote in history textbooks. Is a discussion of post-modernity a distraction from the real work of Faith and Order? Second, "the Post-Modern world. " "Postmodern " is a notoriously slippery concept. What makes the postmodern world post-modern? One can focus on simple definitions, such Lyotard's well-known "incredulity toward metanarratives, " but will that do if one is seeking an analysis that will guide fruitful discussion and action? The devil is in the details.1 And is postmodernity actually post-modern? Has it left modernity behind or is it just another moment in the dialectical evolution of modernity? The end of modernity has been declared repeatedly, at least since the Romantics at the beginning of the 19th century. Modernity has buried 1For a survey of the variant meanings of “postmodern ” from a theological perspective, see Paul

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0230.043
Scholarly communication0.0120.020
Open science0.0020.012
Research integrity0.0140.024
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPragmatism in Philosophy and EducationFrench-language works237,207