An International Psychology of Men: Theoretical Advances, Case Studies, and Clinical Innovations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AN INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY OF MEN: THEORETICAL ADVANCES, CASE STUDIES, AND CLINICAL INNOVATIONS, by Chris Blazina and David S. Shen-Miller. New York: Routledge, 2011, 403 pp. An International Psychology of Men is an edited collection that highlights the research and clinical implications of understanding men and masculinities. The thirteen chapters of the book are organized in three sections: Theoretical Models; Masculinity, Sexuality, Health Behaviors and Body Image; and Clinical Innovations and Programs for Men. Because the majority of the literature on masculinity and males has reflected a US perspective, the editors created a book that enlisted contributors from nine countries- Argentina, Australia, Canada, Denmark, India, Northern Ireland, South Africa, England, and the United States-to reflect more global diversity. An International Psychology of Men identifies and highlights how and where masculinity intersects with different cultures to paint a more nuanced and precise picture of both the macro and internalized forces that affect men. Thus, the book provides a kaleidoscope of cultural perspectives on forces from around the globe that describe the factors affect men's choices, practices and behaviors; these perspectives help to expand the worldview that researchers use to explore masculinity. In the introduction of the book, the editors develop and offer a framework for examining the international context of masculinity that considers individual, interpersonal and social levels. They link the literature that explores how gender is enacted when men construct and reconstruct personal accounts of masculinity; how gender and masculinity are enacted in interpersonal, familial and group contexts; and how cultural shifts, historical changes and socio-political developments affect masculinity. The goal of this book was not to homogenize masculinity or create a singular global perspective but to sample the diverse ways that the psychology of men is understood and approached around the world. Adopting a global perspective and international ways of thinking highlights the critical role culture has in contextualizing knowledge. Because theories generated within any geographic and cultural context have limited generalizability, there is a need to examine the generalizability of masculinity and gender measures and constructs. The contributors highlight how masculinity and femininity are multidimensional constructs, yet they are frequently operationalized and measured as individual factors. It is critical to help researchers and clinicians move beyond their culturally encapsulated theories, models, viewpoints and ethnocentric biases to identify universal truths about men as well as how constructs vary by context and culture. Much of the book focuses on the intersection of masculinity and historical sociopolitical dynamics within specific countries. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".