Bibliographic record
Abstract
Technology in Libraries: Essays in Honor of Anne Grodzins Lipow The Teaching Library: Rethinking Library Services Ellen Meltzer From Undergraduate Library to Teaching Library The James K. Moffitt Undergraduate Library, opened in the fall of 1970 on the University of California, Berkeley campus, was conceived and completed during a period of escalating democracy on college campuses with undergraduate libraries as one example. Prior to this period of student activism, undergraduates at large universities were traditionally denied access to the stacks of the research collections. To get their hands on books, they had to fill out a slip and request that the books or bound journals they wanted to read be paged from the stacks. Students could go through a lengthy process of identifying items from the enormous card catalog (taking up two massive rooms), filling out forms for each desired title, standing in a long line, and waiting, only to discover that what they had paged was not what they really needed. In a growth economy, emerging spirit of openness and free speech, several large university campuses built new undergraduate libraries. 2 Between 1960-1970, the Universities of British Columbia, Missouri, Wisconsin, Indiana, Miami, Pennsylvania, Cornell, Southern California, Notre Dame, Pennsylvania State, Alberta, Texas, Washington, Johns Hopkins, Boston, Florida, SUNY-Albany, Stanford, Ohio State, Bowling Green, Cleveland State, Miami University, UC San Diego, Michigan State, Pittsburgh, Texas A&M, Hawaii, North Carolina, Duke, Iowa State, Nebraska, UC Berkeley, Ellen Meltzer is Information Services Manager at the California Digital Library (CDL). She is responsible for overseeing user services for resources and services managed by the CDL. Prior to this position, she served as Senior Associate for Education, Usability and Outreach at the CDL. She came to the CDL from the UC Berkeley Library in 2001, where she served in a variety of positions, most recently as Head of the Teaching Library. Technology in Libraries: Essays in Honor of Anne Grodzins Lipow, ed. Roy Tennant. Lulu.com, 2008. Person, Roland Conrad. A New Path: Undergraduate Libraries at United States and Canadian Universities, 1949-1987. New York, Greenwood Press: 1988.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.043 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.037 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.036 | 0.051 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Research integrity | 0.012 | 0.015 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".