MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W33103513 · doi:10.1177/1090198120965509

Systems and algorithms for automated collaborative observation using networked robotic cameras

2011· book-chapter· en· W33103513 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yiliang Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueProQuest LLC eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Automated Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of telerobotic systems has evolved from Single Operator Single Robot (SOSR) systems to Multiple Operator Multiple Robot (MOMR) systems. The relationship between human operators and robots follows the master-slave control architecture and the requests for controlling robot actuation are completely generated by human operators. Recently, the fast evolving advances in network and computer technologies and decreasing size and cost of sensors and robots enable us to further extend the MOMR system architecture to incorporate heterogeneous components such as humans, robots, sensors, and automated agents. The requests for controlling robot actuation are generated by all the participants. We term it as the MOMR++ system. However, to reach the best potential and performance of the system, there are many technical challenges needing to be addressed. In this dissertation, we address two major challenges in the MOMR++ system development. We first address the robot coordination and planning issue in the application of an autonomous crowd surveillance system. The system consists of multiple robotic pan-tilt-zoom (PTZ) cameras assisted with a fixed wide-angle camera. The wide-angle camera provides an overview of the scene and detects moving objects, which are required for close-up views using the PTZ cameras. When applied to the pedestrian surveillance application and compared to a previous work, the system achieves increasing number of observed objects by over 210% in heavy traffic scenarios. The key issue here is given the limited number (e.g., p (p > 0)) of PTZ cameras and many more (e.g., n (n >> p)) observation requests, how to coordinate the cameras to best satisfy all the requests. We formulate this problem as a new camera resource allocation problem. Given p cameras, n observation requests, and [epsilon] being approximation bound, we develop an approximation algorithm running in O(n/[epsilon]³ + p²/[epsilon]⁶) time, and an exact algorithm, when p = 2, running in O(n³) time. We then address the automatic object content analysis and recognition issue in the application of an autonomous rare bird species detection system. We set up the system in the forest near Brinkley, Arkansas. The camera monitors the sky, detects motions, and preserves video data for only those targeted bird species. During the one-year search, the system reduces the raw video data of 29.41TB to only 146.7MB (reduction rate 99.9995%). The key issue here is to automatically recognize the flying bird species. We verify the bird body axis dynamic information by an extended Kalman filter (EKF) and compare the bird dynamic state with the prior knowledge of the targeted bird species. We quantify the uncertainty in recognition due to the measurement uncertainty and develop a novel Probable Observation Data Set (PODS)-based EKF method. In experiments with real video data, the algorithm achieves 95% area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Through the exploration of the two MOMR++ systems, we conclude that the new MOMR++ system architecture enables much wider range of participants, enhances the collaboration and interaction between participants so that information can be exchanged in between, suppresses the chance of any individual bias or mistakes in the observation process, and further frees humans from the control/observation process by providing automatic control/observation. The new MOMR++ system architecture is a promising direction for future telerobtics advances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProQuest LLC eBooks→Same topicRobotics and Automated Systems→French-language works237,207→