Eloquent Elisions: The Expressive Play of Silence in María Luisa Bemberg's "De eso no se habla"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este art?culo, se explora la funci?n de la ret?rica del silencio en la construcci?n de significado en De eso no se habla de la directora argentina, Mar?a Luisa Bemberg. La pel?cula se construye a base de un juego entre silencio y discurso, ausencia y presencia, lo impl?cito y lo expl?cito, no s?lo al nivel del contenido, sino tambi?n al nivel estructural cinematogr?fico. Esta tensi?n constante le obliga al espectador a participar m?s activamente en la generaci?n de un significado textual, al mismo tiempo que abre ?l texto f?lmico a m?ltiples interpretaciones. La insistencia en la importancia de lo no dicho, ese (Ceso de lo cual no se habla nunca, enfin de cuentas le lleva al espectador a ver en los personajes un modelo de la relaci?n entre autor-texto-receptor, modelo en el cual la imagen de Charlotte, una presencia sumamente visible pero simult?neamente ausente en t?rminos de su subjetividad propia, funciona como un texto co-creado por la madre-autora y el marido-lector. El escape de la enana con el circo al final, de esa manera, representa la liberaci?n del texto de los l?mites impuestos por el control autorialy la imposici?n autoritaria de una sola interpretaci?n can?nica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".