Wait times for head and neck cancer patients in the Maritime provinces.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess wait times for surgery and radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients from the Maritime provinces. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 275 Maritime head and neck cancer patients treated between 2007 and 2009 by the tertiary Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Service at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre (QEII HSC) in Halifax, Nova Scotia, was conducted to assess surgical and radiotherapy wait times. RESULTS: The mean wait time from referral to assessment by a head and neck surgeon was 15 days. The mean wait time from the initial consultation with a head and neck surgeon to surgery was 33 days, with 42% waiting more than 28 days and 18% waiting more than 42 days for surgery. The mean wait time from surgery to postoperative radiotherapy was 74 days, with 94% of patients waiting more than 42 days. The mean wait time from referral to Radiation Oncology to assessment by a radiation oncologist was 10 days. The mean wait time from ready to treat to radiotherapy was 21 days, with 74% of patients waiting more than 14 days. CONCLUSION: Maritime head and neck cancer patients wait longer than established guidelines for both surgery and radiotherapy and may be at increased risk for negative outcomes because of delayed treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".