International Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for E-Learning (SW-EL'05)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The SW-EL'05 workshop at AIED'05 covers topics related to the use of ontologies for knowledge representation in intelligent educational systems, modularised and standardized architectures, achievement of interoperability between intelligent learning applications, sharable user models and knowledge components and support for authoring of intelligent educational systems. Two focus-sessions are included in the workshop: 1) Application of Semantic Web technologies for Adaptive Learning Systems, which focuses on personalization and adaptation in educational systems (flexible user models), ontology-based reasoning for personalising the educational Semantic Web, and on techniques and methods to capture and employ learner semantics. 2) Application of Semantic Web technologies for Educational Information Systems, which focuses on Semantic Web-based indexing/annotation of educational content (incl. individual and community based), on ontology-based information browsing and retrieval and Semantic Web/ontology based recommender systems. Papers presented in the workshop illustrate Semantic Web-based methods, techniques, and tools for building and sharing educational content, models of users, and personalisation components; services in the context of intelligent educational systems (i.e. authoring service, user modelling service, etc.) and ontology evolution, versioning and consistency. A key part of the reported results are related to empirical research on Intelligent Educational Systems presenting real-world systems and case studies and providing community and individual support by using Semantic Web-technologies and ontologies. The workshop is also a forum for presenting research performed within the context of the KALEIDOSCOPE and PROLEARN network of excellences. Other editions of the SW-EL workshop include: • SW-EL'05 at ICALT'05, Kaohsiung, Taiwan • SW-EL'05 at AIED'05, Amsterdam, The Netherlands • SW-EL'05 at K-CAP'05, Banff, Canada • SW-EL'04 at AH'04, Eindhoven, The Netherlands • SW-EL'04 at ITS'04, Maceio, Brazil • SW-EL'04 at ISWC'04, Hiroshima, Japan General workshop web site: http://www.win.tue.nl/SW-EL/index.html
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".