MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W33241414 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfaa279

La dimension affective du rapport à l'écrit d'élèves québécois

2009· article· en· W33241414 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Suzanne‐G. Chartrand, Michèle Prince

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Language Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFondation du ReinAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyReading (process)PhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comprendre le rapport a l’ecrit des eleves est essentiel pour agir sur le developpement de leurs capacites langagieres, cle de voute du developpement intellectuel, de la reussite sco‐ laire et de l’epanouissement personnel et social. La recherche Scriptura sur les activites de lecture et d’ecriture menees dans les classes d’histoire et de science du secondaire au Que‐ bec a explore le rapport a l’ecrit des eleves. Les reponses de 1 150 eleves a un questionnaire et d’entretiens avec sept eleves de 4e secondaire permet de decrire, du moins en partie, une des dimensions de ce rapport a multiples facettes, la dimension affective. Il ressort une nette difference entre le rapport a l’ecrit des filles et celui des garcons, du moins dans sa dimension affective. Par ailleurs, le manque d’interet de tous les eleves pour la lecture et l’ecriture en histoire et sciences est manifeste. Mots cles : adolescence, affectivite, competences langagieres, enseignement secondaire literacie, rapport a l’ecrit Understanding students’ relationship to writing and reading is essential to the develop‐ ment of their language abilities, the keystone of their intellectual growth and academic success, as well as their social and personal well‐being. The Scriptura research project on reading and writing, which was conducted in secondary history and science classes in Quebec, studied students’ relationship to writing and reading. Results from 1150 question‐ naire responses, and in‐depth interviews with seven tenth‐grade students, allow a partial description of one of the many facets of this relationship, the affective dimension. Our study shows a significant difference between boys’ and girls’ relationships to writing and reading, at least in the affective aspects. Furthermore, all students show a marked lack of interest in writing and reading in history and science classes. Key words: adolescence, affectivity, language skills, literacy, relationship to writing and reading, secondary education

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducationSame topicFrench Language Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207