MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3332974 · doi:10.1002/yea.320030307

"Enlightened Absolutism" and Utopian Thought: Fern?ndez de Lizardi and Reform in New Spain

2000· article· en· W3332974 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Beatriz de Alba-Koch

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Las reformas borb?nicas implantadas en la Nueva Espa?a por el visitador Jos? de G?lvez, y su brutal represi?n de las sublevaciones de ij6y suscitadas a ra?z de la expulsi?n de los Jesu?tas, inician en el virreinato la ?poca del absolutismo ilustrado. Escribiendo en El Periquillo Sarniento (1816), en lo que habr?a de ser las postrimer?as del virreinato, Jos? Joaqu?n Fern?ndez de Lizardi hace clara su intenci?n reformista para la Nueva Espa?a. La reforma de los valores y la orientaci?n de la conducta hacia una ?tica del trabajo, aunada a una severa represi?n de la delincuencia por medio de castigos p?blicos ejemplares, son preocupaciones centrales que llevan a Fern?ndez de Lizardi a crear una sociedad ideal en la imaginaria isla asi?tica de Saucheof?. Ah? interpreta las ideas de Beccaria y Lardiz?bal respecto al derecho penal; su justificaci?n de los mecanismos de terror del estado subraya el lado obscuro de la Ilustraci?n. Las estrategias narrativas empleadas en el Periquillo se orientan a obtener el Anschaulichkeit valorado por los ilustrados; en la utop?a propuesta por Fern?ndez de Lizardi el pat?bulo es un libro de texto y las instituciones del estado aseguran la transparencia del orden social.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.028
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Canadiense de Estudios HispánicosSame topicHistorical Studies in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207