"Enlightened Absolutism" and Utopian Thought: Fern?ndez de Lizardi and Reform in New Spain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Las reformas borb?nicas implantadas en la Nueva Espa?a por el visitador Jos? de G?lvez, y su brutal represi?n de las sublevaciones de ij6y suscitadas a ra?z de la expulsi?n de los Jesu?tas, inician en el virreinato la ?poca del absolutismo ilustrado. Escribiendo en El Periquillo Sarniento (1816), en lo que habr?a de ser las postrimer?as del virreinato, Jos? Joaqu?n Fern?ndez de Lizardi hace clara su intenci?n reformista para la Nueva Espa?a. La reforma de los valores y la orientaci?n de la conducta hacia una ?tica del trabajo, aunada a una severa represi?n de la delincuencia por medio de castigos p?blicos ejemplares, son preocupaciones centrales que llevan a Fern?ndez de Lizardi a crear una sociedad ideal en la imaginaria isla asi?tica de Saucheof?. Ah? interpreta las ideas de Beccaria y Lardiz?bal respecto al derecho penal; su justificaci?n de los mecanismos de terror del estado subraya el lado obscuro de la Ilustraci?n. Las estrategias narrativas empleadas en el Periquillo se orientan a obtener el Anschaulichkeit valorado por los ilustrados; en la utop?a propuesta por Fern?ndez de Lizardi el pat?bulo es un libro de texto y las instituciones del estado aseguran la transparencia del orden social.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".