Treatment of vaginal agenesis using a modified McIndoe technique: Long-term follow-up of 23 patients and a literature review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Congenital vaginal agenesis is a rare malformation with an incidence of one in 4000 to 5000 female newborns. The purpose of vaginal agenesis treatment is not only to create an adequate passageway for penetration but also to facilitate satisfactory sexual intercourse. OBJECTIVE: To present the results of a modified McIndoe technique with respect to sexual function, vaginal length and complication rates in patients with vaginal agenesis. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2010, 23 patients with vaginal agenesis were admitted to the Gynecology Clinic of Istanbul University School of Medicine (Istanbul, Turkey) for vaginal reconstruction. All patients underwent a modified McIndoe procedure. The long-term results with a follow-up period ranging from 18 to 118 months are presented. RESULTS: The postoperative mean vaginal length was 8.4 cm (range 6 cm to 11 cm) in 19 patients who used the mould regularly. Among 14 patients who used the mould regularly and had partners, only one experienced severe pain during intercourse and 13 reported that they were engaging in satisfactory sexual activity with mild or no pain, and with good mucosal sensitivity. Conversely, two of three patients who used the mould irregularly experienced severe pain during intercourse and had a mean vaginal length of 6 cm (range 4 cm to 8 cm). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that a modified McIndoe technique is a simple, effective procedure for the treatment of vaginal agenesis; however, proper mould use after surgery remains the cornerstone of the treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".