Installation Development Environmental Assessment at Joint Base Andrews-Naval Air Facility Washington Prince George's County, Maryland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract : JBA proposes a program of targeted construction and demolition activities intended to improve its operational efficiency and ensure that the installation can sustain its current and future national security operations and mission-readiness status. The proposed activities are: * Construct a Helicopter Operations Facility. * Construct a new fitness center and demolish the West Fitness Center (Building 1444). * Construct a new Child Development Center (CDC) and demolish CDC #1 (Building 4575). * Construct a Security Forces Group complex and demolish two buildings (Building 1642 [Base Library] and Building 1605 [a vehicle wash rack]) that are on the site selected for the complex. * Enlarge the parking lot adjacent to Building 1845. * Demolish Building 1988 (a traffic check house) and construct a new traffic check house in the same location. * Demolish Buildings 1429 (a generator building), 1679 (Chapel 3), and 1732 (a heat plant), and the canopy and fuel tanks at Building 1685 (a former Army and Air Force Exchange Service gas station). * Modify three entry control facilities (Main Gate, Pearl Harbor Gate, and Virginia Gate).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".