MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W335184081

Composite Ni-P=TiO2 Electrocoatings for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction in Alkaline Solutions

2004· article· en· W335184081 on OpenAlexaff
Bożena Łosiewicz, A. Budniok, Andrzej Lasia, E. Łągiewka

Bibliographic record

VenuePolish Journal of Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryElectrodeHydrogenPolarization (electrochemistry)DiffractionComposite numberStoichiometryAdsorptionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Dielectric spectroscopyInorganic chemistryChemical engineeringElectrochemistryPhysical chemistryComposite materialMaterials scienceOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) has been studied in alkaline media using three types of electrodes: (i) electrocoated with Ni-P + TiO 2 , (ii) electrocoated with Ni-P + TiO 2 and heated at 400°C, (iii) electrocoated withNi-P + TiO 2 and heated at 500°C. The heating was carried out in argon atmosphere. Topographical and structural changes of Ni-P + TiO 2 coatings before and after heating were investigated applying geometric surface structure (GSS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) methods. GSS results were presented graphically in 2 and 3 dimensions. Steady-state polarization and ac impedance spectroscopy were used to determine electrode activities. HER proceeded via Volmer-Heyrovsky mechanism. The effectiveness of HER depended on the intrinsic activity. HER was enhanced when heating was applied, due to the increased amount of non-stoichiometric Ti oxides (facilitating H reduction/adsorption), comparing to the unheated Ni-P + TiO 2 electrode. The most efficient HER proceeded under the following conditions: 5 MKOH, 25°C, Ni-P + TiO 2 electrode heated to 500°C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolish Journal of ChemistrySame topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207