MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W335379054

Using Community-Based Macrolevel Collision Prediction Models to Evaluate Safety Level of Neighborhood Road Network Patterns

2010· article· en· W335379054 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gordon Lovegrove, James Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Board 89th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubdivisionGridMacroCollisionTransport engineeringComputer scienceSustainable developmentOffset (computer science)Ring roadGeographyEngineeringComputer securityCivil engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The enormous social and economic burden imposed on society by injuries due to road collisions is a major global problem. Authorities worldwide have been researching ways to reduce this burden using more proactive road safety planning approaches that build on traditional reactive approaches. Results of recent research suggest that a major cause of the road safety problem lies in a built community form that nurtures over dependence on auto use, leading to increased exposure, risk, and road collisions. In response, the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) has begun research on a new model for sustainable subdivision development ¨C The Fused Grid road network pattern. Results of initial traffic flow and accessibility studies suggest that this model has potential to promote increasingly sustainable development patterns by combining several redeeming features from pre-existing models. Subsequently, the study reported on in this paper was initiated to evaluate the relative road safety level of the Fused Grid compared with four other networks, including: commonly-used 1) grid and 2) culs-de-sac patterns, and, recently developed 3) 3-way offset and 4) Dutch sustainable road safety (SRS) patterns. Using community-based, macro-level collision prediction models (CPMs) developed with data from three Canadian regions ¨C Vancouver, Ottawa, and Victoria - the road safety level of each pattern was evaluated. Analysis involved testing theoretical road network modules as well as comparisons with existing neighborhoods. Statistically significant results were obtained, and suggested that neighborhoods built following CMHCi¯s Fused Grid road network pattern would realize a 30 to 60% higher level of road safety than the commonly-used grid and culs-de-sac patterns, and a level of safety comparable to the 3-Way Offset pattern. Next steps in this research involve built-form experiments to validate these significant but still theoretical road safety results, as a precursor to wider implementation by land use and transportation planners to sustainable road safety improvement in communities worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.186
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Board 89th Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardSame topicTraffic and Road SafetyFrench-language works237,207