Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, graphene oxide and composites of graphene oxide-iron modified clinoptilolite were synthesized and used for arsenate removal from aqueous solution. All adsorbents were characterized using X-ray diffraction and specific surface area analysis. The specific surface areas of composites were found to be less than the iron modified clinoptilolite. The time required to reach equilibrium was determined as 3 hours for all adsorbents. The Box-Behnken statistical experiment design method was used to determine the effects of initial arsenate concentration, pH and the amount of adsorbent on the percent arsenate removal. Graphene oxide was not as effective as composites for arsenate adsorption from water. Arsenate adsorption on composites was showed good compatibility with the Freundlich isotherm. The maximum arsenate uptake was realized at pH 4 for graphene oxide and at pH 7 for composites. The maximum adsorption capacities obtained at the optimum points determined by using the Box-Behnken design method were calculated as 39.49, 117.98 and 124.64 µg.g<sup>-1</sup> for graphene oxide and composites, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".