Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Based on the cultural shocks in the education management for international students in China, cross-cultural management can improve the management efficiency and promote education of international student in China effectively. Key Words: Cross-cultural management; Foreign students in China; Culture shock; Higher education; Internationalization With the development of higher-education internationalization, more and more international students have studied in China. The total number of international students exceeded 230,000 in 2009, reached 26 million in 2010. According to China's long-term Education Program, the number of foreign students in China will reach 50 million in 2050. China will become a country with a big number international students.These international students have become the main body of cross-cultural education. Therefore, facing to cultural conflict in the management of international students, cross-cultural management can resolve cultural conflicts, and promote the steady development. It is the effect way to the administrators in universities who are in charge of the international education. 1. CROSS-CULTURAL MANAGEMENT Cross-cultural management means the management depending on different cultural backgrounds of people, goods and the management thing and so on. Crosscultural Management for International Students means the management for overseas students in order to improve the international quality and strengthen the academic influence. With the advancement in science and technology, the world economy is developing rapidly, and emerging international trend. Higher-education has gone beyond the national boundaries, and international students studying in China meet some shocks in different economic environment, political environment, legal and social environment. Now cross-cultural management for international students studying in China is very important. In Chinese cultural environment, communications between the administrators and international students is often quite different, mainly because of the different cultural environment. Cross-cultural management need full understanding of cultural factors to understand each other, to clear the shocks and to realize the teaching aids successfully. 2. CROSS-CULTURAL MANAGEMENT CAN CLEAR THE CULTURE SHOCK OF OVERSEA STUDENTS Culture is a phenomenon that the human may be nervous sometimes, or feel uneasy in the psychological states, which leads to the abnormal of mental and emotions. Somebody considers this culture shock as a kind of disease, which can be often see from people who suddenly leave their familiar native or social environment to a totally strange alien and society. The factors that people can stand the effect of in different degrees are determined by their experiences, education situation and their adaptability to changes of their environment. There are various differences between the national and social environment of the foreign students and the exotic culture, which have effected on their lives and study in some degree. The main reasons are as follows. 2.1 Different Values and Customs can Bring Culture Shock In western countries, people believe in personal dignity, praise highly personal spirit and carry forward personal value. Their standard of being human is putting themselves first. Westerners are good at independent thinking, judgment and solving problems, and they realize their personal dreams and aims by themselves. They respect others, keep distance to others' privacy, cherish money and organize their work, study and entertainment well without wasting any time. Some students coming from Africa and Middle East where their agriculture are still in the primary stage and the pace of their lives is slow, because of which the Africans have very little time consciousness no matter their post and education degree and are often late for class. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".