MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Leptin protects rat cardiomyocytes from H2O2‐ and hypoxia‐induced apoptosis

2008· article· en· W33725450 on OpenAlexaff
Eyun‐Jung Shin, Megumi Eguchi, Yuan-Tao Liu, Gary Sweeney

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeptinInternal medicineApoptosisEndocrinologyHypoxia (environmental)AnnexinChemistryMitochondrionPhosphatidylserineCytochrome cHeart failureReactive oxygen speciesObesityMedicineBiochemistryOxygenMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obesity increases the risk of heart failure, yet there is also compelling evidence suggesting a protective effect of obesity on subsequent events post‐myocardial infarction. Leptin, the product of the obese ( ob ) gene, circulates at higher concentrations in obese individuals. The objective of this work was to investigate the effect of leptin on cardiomyocyte apoptosis; a well known component of cardiac remodeling that can contribute to heart failure in obesity. We used H 2 O 2 and hypoxia to mimic myocardial ischemia in vitro and first demonstrated that the decreased viability of H9c2 rat cardiomyocytes exposed to H 2 O 2 was attenuated by pretreating cells with leptin (6nM) for 1hr. Similarly, exposure to H 2 O 2 or hypoxia increased phosphatidylserine exposure as measured via annexin V binding, decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, increased cytochrome c release from mitochondria and elevated activity of caspase‐3 measured by cleavage and enzymatic assay. Importantly, all of the above were prevented when cells were pretreated with leptin for 1hr. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that leptin has anti‐apoptotic effects in rat cardiomyocytes which may be of significance in regulating the development of heart failure in obesity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→