MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W337479017

Implementation of generalized coarse-mesh rebalance in NEWTRNX for acceleration of parallel block-jacobi transport

2007· article· en· W337479017 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kevin T. Clamo

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Nuclear Society · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputational scienceSolverDiscretizationParallel computingComputer sciencePartition (number theory)Massively parallelGeneralized minimal residual methodNeutron transportBlock (permutation group theory)ScalingAlgorithmApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationResidualMathematicsGeometryMathematical analysisPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The NEWTRNX [1] transport module solves the multigroup, discrete-ordinates source-driven or k-eigenvalue transport equation in parallel on a 3-D unstructured tetrahedral mesh using the extended step characteristics (ESC) [2], also known as the slice-balance approach (SBA), spatial discretization. The spatial domains are decomposed using METIS [3]. NEWTRNX is under development for nuclear reactor analysis on computer hardware ranging from clusters to massively parallel machines, like the Cray XT4. Transport methods that rely on full sweeps across the spatial domain have been shown to display poor scaling for thousands of processors. The Parallel Block-Jacobi (PBJ) algorithm allows each spatial partition to sweep over all discrete-ordinate directions and energies independently of all other domains, potentially allowing for much better scaling than possible with full sweeps [4]. The PBJ algorithm has been implemented in NEWTRNX using a Gauss-Seidel iteration in energy and an asynchronous communication by an energy group, such that each partition utilizes the latest boundary solution available for each group before solving the withingroup scattering in a given group. For each energy group, the within-group scattering converges with a generalized minimum residual (GMRES) solver [5], preconditioned with beta transport synthetic acceleration (β-TSA) [6].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Nuclear SocietySame topicNuclear reactor physics and engineeringFrench-language works237,207