Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tom Clavin and Danny Peary. Roger Maris: Baseball's Reluctant Hero. New York: Touchstone/Simon and Schuster, 2010. 422 pp. Cloth. $26.99. Some in the press called him surly. Others labeled him a whiner. To Robert Creamer in 1963 he was unsatisfactory hero. But much of this perception, as Tom Clavin and Danny Peary make abundantly clear in their excellent biography of Roger Maris, was created by the press: With relentless negativity, they drove him into becoming exactly what they wanted him to be: a bitter person whom anyone would have difficulty calling a hero (263). It's not that was entirely blameless or did nothing to contribute to his problems with the press. was an intensely private man, a no-nonsense player who found it impossible to open up to anyone but those closest to him. was direct and abrupt to a fault, refusing to suffer fools, even if doing so would have benefited his image. And according to Clavin and Peary, he was unforgiving toward those he felt had wronged him in some way. To illustrate the point, the authors tell the story of Mars's refusal to attend the fiftieth anniversary celebration of Yankee Stadium in 1973. In late 1966, Yankees general manager Lee MacPhail sent to the Cardinals without informing the player, even though had told the GM months earlier his preference to retire rather than be traded. It engendered a decades-long hatred of MacPhail. Confronting the Yankee boss in the spring that year, told him, the Cardinals have an Old-Timers Day, I go. If you have one, I don't. Is that plain enough? (352). Clavin and Peary interviewed well over a hundred of Mars's surviving family members, friends, teammates, and former opponents in building their portrait of a complex, misunderstood personality. They delved extensively into his childhood, addressing such issues as the marital conflict between his parents, and his mother's lifelong feud with the Maras branch of the family (which led to the change in the spelling of his last name), to explain his obsession with privacy. He was such a bad interview, they assert, because he grew up being secretive about his family, and, even more so than other Midwesterners, thinking questions of any type were rude and an invasion of his privacy (168). They also paint a picture of a loving family man and a great teammate. Those interviewed testify to his integrity, modesty, humility, kindness, and sense of humor, traits not seen--or outright ignored--by the press. It was a side of him that seemed to intentionally keep hidden from those he considered to be outsiders. The authors relate a tale that captures the essence of the man: During a series in Baltimore late in the 1961 season, and friend Whitey Herzog slipped by reporters to twice visit a sick child in Johns Hopkins Hospital. While public knowledge of this event would have gone a long way toward humanizing the star, Maris never wanted publicity when he visited hospitals during his career. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.072 | 0.029 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".