Bibliographic record
Abstract
The history of Myology in Italy begins in 16th century with muscle anatomy pictures by Vesalius and Canani while in the 19th century the Neapolitan physician Gaetano Conte described Duchenne muscular dystrophy on clinical basis (1). Myology reached a major development in the 20th century with the establishment of the CNR center in Padova (professor Massimiliano Aloisi) a cardiomyological and genetic center in Naples (professor Giovanni Nigro) and a neurological center in Milan (professor Guglielmo Scarlato). In the 60th prof. Aloisi and Federico Milcovich, a myodystrophic patient, started the Italian Muscular Dystrophy patients association (UILDM) with contacts with MDA (2). The first congress in Neuromuscular diseases took place in Milan in 1969 by the organization of professor Scarlato, Aloisi, Canal and was attended by several outstanding international muscle researchers such as AG Engel, WK Engel, LP Rowland, M.Fardeau and I.Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz. Eleven meetings in many countries followed this, up to the last XII international Congress on Neuromuscular Diseases in Naples in 2010. Several laboratories arose in the country especially in Neurological Institutes; several researchers emigrated permanently or went for a stage to improve their myological skills especially in USA, UK, Canada, France both in basic and/or pathological, clinical research (Table 1). The laboratory of Columbia in New York, lead by professor Di Mauro was a common place of training especially in the field of mitochondrial myopathies. Table 1. The main international connections. As in other developed countries, the basis of neuromuscular research and diagnosis were expanded on immunohistochemical, biochemical and molecular grounds, during the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century. Enzo Ferrari – a race car factory engineer – was a support to research in muscular dystrophy in Milan, Padova and Modena. Telethon has contributed to support in neuromuscular disorders. Myology with the enlargement of scientific basis in the molecular era began to split in subspecialities i.e. genetics, physiopathology etc. and a spectrum of knowledge was accumulated both for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. In the field of metabolic diseases and limb-girdle myopathies several Italian laboratories described new entities. A number of treatments, beside the treatment of inflammatory myopathies and myasthenia gravis, were found and applied in metabolic myopathies: i.e. carnitine, Coenzyme Q, enzyme replacement in glycogenosis type II. The continuous challenge of the treatment of the primary muscular dystrophy remains for the future since so far there are only emerging molecular therapies: antisense oligonucleotides in DMD, adenoviral therapy in sarcoglycanopathies, cell therapy might contribute to answer to a promises for muscular patients. In the translation area many laboratories and Italian groups continue with new researchers and they have contributed to meetings of European Neuromuscular Center and to the Foundation and organisation of the World Muscle Society with meetings in Italy (Naples, Taormina), and to the Treat – NMD and Eurobiobank networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".