Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Let M m be an m -dimensional, closed and smooth manifold, equipped with a smooth involution T : M m → M m whose fixed point set has the form F n ∪ F j , where F n and F j are submanifolds with dimensions n and j , F j is indecomposable and n > j . Write n – j = 2 p q , where q ≥ 1 is odd and p ≥ 0, and set m ( n – j ) = 2 n + p – q +1 if p ≤ q +1 and m ( n – j ) = 2 n +2 p – q if p ≥ q . In this paper we show that m ≤ m ( n – j ) + 2 j + 1. Further, we show that this bound is almost best possible, by exhibiting examples ( M m ( n – j )+2 j , T ) where the fixed point set of T has the form F n ∪ F j described above, for every 2 ≤ j < n and j not of the form 2 t – 1 (for j = 0 and 2, it has been previously shown that m ( n – j ) + 2 j is the best possible bound). The existence of these bounds is guaranteed by the famous 5/2-theorem of J. Boardman, which establishes that under the above hypotheses .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it