Prophylactic efficacy and pharmacokinetically guided dosing of a von Willebrand factor/factor VIII concentrate in adults and children with von Willebrand's disease undergoing elective surgery: a pooled and comparative analysis of data from USA and European Union clinical trials.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical intervention may pose significant risk of life-threatening bleeding in patients with von Willebrand's disease; prophylactic treatment with von Willebrand factor/factor VIII concentrate is generally indicated for von Willebrand's disease characterized by moderate to severe qualitative and quantitative deficiencies of Willebrand factor to raise and maintain both Willebrand factor and FVIII at haemostatic levels for surgical prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since prospective clinical data in such situations were lacking, two recent, prospective, multicentre studies evaluated the prophylactic perioperative use of the on Willebrand factor/ factor VIII concentrates, Humate-P® and Haemate P. Despite some differences in the two studies, one conducted in the USA (n =35) and one in the European Union (n =27), the designs were similar enough to allow for a limited pooled analysis of data. In both studies, preoperative loading doses and subsequent maintenance doses were calculated using individual subject-derived incremental in vivo recovery values, although von Willebrand factor:ristocetin cofactor and FVIII:coagulation activity target levels differed between the protocols. Efficacy was rated daily by the investigator as excellent, good, moderate, or poor. RESULTS: Overall haemostatic efficacy (rating of excellent/good), assessed 24 hours after the last infusion (USA) or taken as the worst rating between surgery and day 14 (EU), was achieved in 95% of the pooled population of 62 adults and children. Efficacy did not appear to be affected by dosing variations. The rate of possibly related adverse events was low (8 subjects; 13%); one of these events was considered serious (pulmonary embolism). DISCUSSION: This pooled analysis of a relatively large number of patients for a rare disease confirms the feasibility of pharmacokinetically guided dosing of von Willebrand factor/factor VIII concentrate and highlights its efficacy and safety in the prevention of excessive perioperative bleeding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".