Niemann-Pick Disease Type A and B are Clinically but also Enzymatically Heterogeneous: Pitfall in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Sphingomyelinase Deficiency Associated with the Mutation Q292 K
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study describes a diagnostic pitfall in the laboratory diagnosis of patients with sphingomyelinase deficiency (SMD; Niemann-Pick disease types A and B; NPA and NPB), in cases where sphingomyelinase activity was not determined with sphingomyelin as the natural enzymic substrate. Four of 24 SMD patients studied had falsely normal or enhanced activity, when a so-called artificial sphingomyelinase substrate, 2-N-(hexadecanoyl)-amino-4-nitrophenyl phosphorylcholine (HNP), was used, whereas SMD was clear with the sphingomyelin substrate. Those four patients had the Q292 K mutation of the acid sphingomyelinase gene (SMPD1) on at least one allele. Three of the four patients (no data available from one) experienced only late-infantile or juvenile, though distinct, neurological involvement, where learning disabilities, hypo- or areflexia or mild ataxia were initial signs. The laboratory pitfall with HNP substrate, which is used in many laboratories, raises the risk that some SMD patients are overlooked, and it prevents the consideration of a late-manifesting neurological course in some patients as well as the planning of enzyme substitution therapy in non-neurological SMD (NPB) patients. Since classical NPB is very rare, it is suggested that SMD patients with late- or mild-manifesting neurological symptoms should better be assigned to additional SMD subgroups than grouped with NPB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it