MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W341385613

The Lovelace Scholarship at Twenty-Five

2011· article· en· W341385613 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andreas Teich

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Hymn · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLiterature, Politics, and Exile Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipHymnAppealHistoryPolitical scienceMedia studiesLawArt historyManagementSociologyArtLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Every summer, at some point during the conference of The Hymn Society in the United States and Canada, handful of people are introduced to the gathered assembly and identified as Lovelace Scholars. They tend to be younger than the average attendee. They attend the annual meeting. For many years they had their picture taken with Austin Lovelace. But who are these people? Where have they come from? Even more important, where have they gone after their introduction to our society? Beginnings In some ways, the Lovelace Scholarship came about by chance. When The Hymn Society met in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania in the summer of 1985, members of our European counterparts, The Hymn Society of Great Britain and Ireland and the Internationale Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Hymnologie were also invited; this was the first time that conference involving all three organizations was held in North America. Two years earlier, at the IAH conference in Budapest, it had become apparent that participation by members from Eastern Europe would be difficult. Visas and round trip travel costs, though challenge, were manageable; but at that time these travelers from behind the Iron Curtain would not be allowed to take out enough money for their expenses while at the conference. Then Austin Lovelace, FHS, had great idea: members of The Hymn Society in the United States and Canada could be invited to contribute to fund to make it possible for these friends to attend.1 The appeal was so successful that after the conference there was money remaining. What should be done? It was decided to invest the money, and use the proceeds to assist students preparing for careers in church music to attend future annual conferences. Since then, 114 students have been beneficiaries of this program. So, after twenty- five years of Lovelace Scholars, where are they now and how did this opportunity impact their lives? The first mention of the scholarships found in The Hymn (October 1988) The initial eight The first eight Lovelace Scholars arrived at the annual conference in Toronto in the summer of 1986. In the first printed reference to the scholars, Janet Cawley wrote in her reflections on the conference that The Hymn Society is a community that is concerned to renew itself by nurturing coming generation of members: eight students with special interest in church music were awarded scholarships to attend the conference.2 From the comments I received from many of the early scholars, conference scholarship was all they understood this to be. They could not have known then that they were beginning tradition. Yet the five from that first class who responded to my inquiries are fine representative sample of the Lovelace Scholars. Robert Scott Foxwell is bivocational church musician. By day, he is an elementary music teacher in Virginia Beach; on weekends, the organist and choir director of an Episcopal Church. A significant number of scholars are bivocational, with their church music position being part-time. In addition, Foxwell is one of the scholars who was drawn into the society - now life member and regular at annual conferences. He writes: The Hymn Society is like family. We get together for family reunions every summer. We always plan our vacations around where the Society plans to go for its annual conferences. Our son was born in 1989 and we took him with us to Calvin College, and [he] has been with us many times. We look forward to every annual conference, but the meetings in Canada are extra special, because of my first one in Toronto.3 Joseph Herl and Esther Crookshank represent the academic side of the Lovelace Scholarship. Both are life members of the society and both have made presentations at annual conferences. Herl teaches at Concordia University in Seward, Nebraska, and Crookshank at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky. In their academic pursuits, they further congregational song. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score0.802

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.004
Scholarly communication0.0120.004
Open science0.0020.017
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2400.090

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe HymnSame topicLiterature, Politics, and Exile StudiesFrench-language works237,207