MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W34302989 · doi:10.1016/j.nano.2021.102441

COMMUTANT OF THE DIRECT SUM OF MULTIPLICATION OPERATORS

2012· article· en· W34302989 on OpenAlexfundno aff
K. Hedayatian

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mathematical Archive · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHolomorphic and Operator Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMultiplication (music)MathematicsBounded functionMultiplication operatorCentralizer and normalizerOperator (biology)Domain (mathematical analysis)Discrete mathematicsComplex planeFinite-rank operatorPure mathematicsBanach spaceCombinatoricsMathematical analysisHilbert space

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fundamental problem in oncology is that anticancer chemotherapeutics kill both cancer and healthy cells in the surrounding tissues. Resveratrol is a natural antioxidant with intriguing and opposing biological properties: it reduces viability of some cancer cells but not of non-transformed ones (in equimolar concentrations). Therefore, we examined resveratrol in human non-transformed primary astrocytes and astrocytoma. Resveratrol reduced reactive oxygen species in astrocytes, but not in astrocytoma. Such cell-type dependent response is particularly evident with analyses at the single cell level showing clear population difference in high and low glutathione levels. Due to resveratrol's poor aqueous solubility that limits its use in clinics, we incorporated it into stimulus-responsive micelles assembled from miktoarm polymers. This could be an attractive chemotherapeutic delivery strategy in nano-oncology. As a proof of principle, we show that these formulations containing resveratrol markedly decrease astrocytoma viability, particularly in combination with temozolomide, a first line chemotherapeutic for astrocytoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Mathematical ArchiveSame topicHolomorphic and Operator TheoryFrench-language works237,207