St. John's Church in the Wilderness: A History of St. John's Cathedral in Denver, Colorado, 1860-2000
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The domain of transcription regulation has been notoriously difficult to annotate in the Gene Ontology, partly because of the intricacies of gene regulation which involve molecular interactions with DNA as well as amongst protein complexes. The molecular function 'transcription coregulator activity' is a part of the biological process 'regulation of transcription, DNA-templated' that occurs in the cellular component 'chromatin'. It can mechanistically link sequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factor (dbTF) regulatory DNA target sites to coactivator and corepressor target sites through the molecular function 'cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA binding'. Many questions arise about transcription coregulators (coTF). Here, we asked how many unannotated, putative coregulators can be identified in protein complexes? Therefore, we mined the CORUM and hu.MAP protein complex databases with known and strongly presumed human transcription coregulators. In addition, we trawled the BioGRID and IntAct molecular interaction databases for interactors of the known 1457 human dbTFs annotated by the GREEKC and GO consortia. This yielded 1093 putative transcription factor coregulator complex subunits, of which 954 interact directly with a dbTF. This substantially expands the set of coTFs that could be annotated to 'transcription coregulator activity' and sets the stage for renewed annotation and wet-lab research efforts. To this end, we devised a prioritisation score based on existing GO annotations of already curated transcription coregulators as well as interactome representation. Since all the proteins that we mined are parts of protein complexes, we propose to concomitantly engage in annotation of the putative transcription coregulator-containing complexes in the Complex Portal database.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it