MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W344735184

Failure and Success in Foster Care Programs

2005· article· en· W344735184 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Judith Reifsteck

Bibliographic record

VenueNorth American journal of psychology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Welfare and Adoption
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFoster careIntervention (counseling)NeglectPsychologyService (business)Clinical psychologyMedicinePsychiatryNursing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of the current study was to classify types of services provided for youth in one sample (N=208) of children in foster care. A comparison review of average Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS) scores on these youth in pre and post intervention groups showed an 14% reduction in average score of impairment of functional status in the post intervention group. CAFAS scores for each class of service were presented. A review of utilization trends and omissions in service suggests that even though some youth and their families benefit slightly from prevention efforts, 82% of the cases in the post intervention group of this sample still have clinically significant elevations in CAFAS scores following provision of services. Considering the persistence of elevated CAFAS scores, it appears that satisfactory services for youth referred for child abuse and neglect are not readily apparent for all children in need. For decades, the number of children in foster care has steadily increased (Courtney, Piliavin, Grogan-Kaylor, & Nesmith, 2001). These children have remained in the foster care system for longer periods of time (Clark et al., 1994), and the long term outcome of the care they received is not systematically monitored or reported (Galaway, Nutter, & Hudson, 1995; Reddy & Pfeiffer, 1997). Some of these children carry the effects of child abuse and trauma, while others are diagnosed with a variety of physical, emotional, behavioral and mental handicaps. Local service agencies are required to adapt, alter and expand the types of services available in the community while budgets and other resources are shrinking. The need for research to guide policy and service planning for child welfare systems of care is evident. Between 1970 and 2000, reports of child abuse and neglect increased from approximately 60,000 to 2.4 million (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2000). Estimates of the percentage of children in the foster care system who are in severe to critical need of mental health services range from 40% to 62% (Boyd, 1992). At the same time, it is estimated that the number of available foster homes for endangered children has decreased. In recent years, the number of youth in foster care nationally has remained steady at approximately 550,000 (Shealy, 1994). In one year (1999), 183,000 children had been in foster care for more than three years while 99,618 of the youth were between the ages of 16 and 21. Approximately 20,000 youth age out (emancipate) from state foster care systems each year (Courtney, Piliavin, Grogan-Kaylor, & Nesmith, 2001). In addition, the percentage of children needing foster placement has increased by 48%, whereas the number of foster homes available has decreased by 27% (Terpstra, & McFadden, 1993). Classification of Types of Services To meet these needs, in recent years, approaches to preserving the family's ability to care for their children have included therapeutic foster care, in home family services, individualized case management, and independent living skills training programs. As early as 1960, several residential treatment programs for children began developing therapeutic foster homes to supplement or serve as an alternative to long term residential care (Galaway, Nutter, & Hudson, 1995; Bryant, & Snodgrass, 1992). In such a program, training support services, enhanced payments and treatment team status is extended to foster parents. The findings of multiple research studies in the U.S., England, and Canada suggest that youth who experience serious emotional and behavior problems are served well in therapeutic foster care. Therapeutic foster care programs are less costly than the institutional and group home alternatives to which they have been compared (Chamberlain, 1990). In Home Family Service is an intensive parent and child intervention which offers therapy, education, referral, and case coordination in the client's home. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.486
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorth American journal of psychologySame topicChild Welfare and AdoptionFrench-language works237,207