Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ S'appuyant principalement sur une perspective politico-économique, ce livre vise à nous donner une meilleure idée de la question de l'apprentissage chez les aînés en adoptant pour ce faire deux perspectives principales: la théorie de l'apprentissage chez l'adulte et la gérontologie sociale. Avec comme toile de fond le vieillissement de la population et les défis associés à l'allongement de l'espérance de vie, le livre comprend neuf chapitres abordant la question de l'éducation et de l'apprentissage des aînés. Cet ouvrage offre une assise permettant un dialogue éclairé entre les secteurs des services sociaux et de l'éducation en ce qui a trait aux responsabilités individuelles, institutionnelles et étatique vis-à-vis la société vieillissante. Il pourrait sensibiliser les étudiants (et les professeurs) aux questions liées aux conditions matérielles des aînés, au contexte dans lequel ceux-ci évoluent, de même qu'à l'environnement politique déterminant la participation à l'éducation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.447 | 0.223 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".