MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W345901615 · doi:10.2527/2005.834825x

Exogenous prolactin stimulates mammary development and alters expression of prolactin-related genes in prepubertal gilts1,2

2005· article· en· W345901615 on OpenAlexaff
C. Farmer, Marie‐France Palin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProlactinInternal medicineEndocrinologyParenchymaLactationBiologyMammary glandGene expressionReceptorLeptinCrossbreedHormoneGeneMedicinePregnancyObesityAnimal science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of this project was to determine whether recombinant porcine (rp) prolactin (PRL) can enhance mammary development when given to pre-pubertal gilts and/or modify the expression of PRL-related genes. Crossbred gilts were injected s.c. twice daily with saline (CTRL; n = 13), 2 mg of rpPRL (4PRL; n = 13), or 4 mg of rpPRL (8PRL; n = 13) in a 2.0-mL volume for a period of 29 d, starting at 75.1 +/- 0.5 kg BW. Jugular blood samples were collected before the first injection, as well as 14 and 28 d later, and were assayed for PRL, IGF-I, and leptin. Gilts were slaughtered on d 29 of treatment, and mammary glands were collected for dissection of parenchymal and extraparenchymal tissues, and for determination of parenchymal DNA, DM, protein, and fat contents. Levels of mRNA for PRL, PRL receptor (PRL-R), and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT5A and STAT5B) were determined via real-time PCR in the mammary parenchyma, as well as levels for PRL and PRL-R in the pituitaries. Treatments did not alter plasma (P = 0.48) IGF-I. Serum concentrations of PRL at slaughter were greater (P < 0.01) in both 4PRL and 8PRL compared with CTRL, whereas at mid-treatment, they were greater (P < 0.05) only in 8PRL gilts. Parenchymal tissue weight and parenchymal DNA concentrations increased with exogenous rpPRL (P < 0.001). The percentage of protein in parenchyma increased (P < 0.001), whereas that of DM (P < 0.001), fat (P < 0.001), and the protein:DNA ratio (P < 0.05) decreased with exogenous rpPRL. Treatment differences were always observed between the 4 mg dose and CTRL, and no further differences were noted when the dose was increased to 8 mg daily. Expression levels of PRL, but not PRL-R, were decreased (P < 0.05) in anterior pituitary glands and mammary glands of treated gilts. The mRNA levels of STAT5A and STAT5B increased (P < 0.05) with exogenous rpPRL. It is evident from these data that rpPRL can stimulate mammogenesis in prepubertal gilts through hyperplasia and increased expression of PRL-related genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchFrench-language works237,207