MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W347981927

Resultats Preliminaires Du Premier Volet D'une Etude Portant Sur la Mise En Place De L'approche Par Competences Professionnelles En Formation a L'enseignement Au Quebec

2009· article· fr· W347981927 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Véronique Jobin, Clermont Gauthier, Sylvie Bidjang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Practices and Policies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, nous presentons les resultats preliminaires du premier volet d’une etude portant sur la mise en place de l’approche par competences professionnelles en formation a l’enseignement au Quebec. Nos donnees ont ete recueillies a partir de questionnaires electroniques auxquels 383 formateurs de maitres ont repondu. Selon les resultats obtenus, 34,5 % des repondants ont indique avoir effectue des change ‐ ments complets ou, du moins, assez substantiels dans leurs pratiques pour s’adapter aux exigences de l’approche par competences professionnelles. Cette etude nous a aussi permis de colliger des informations sur d’autres themes relatifs a l’application de l’approche par competences professionnelles tels que la position des formateurs a l’endroit de cette approche, la formation recue a l’utilisation de cette approche et les appreciations de cette approche. Mots cles : enquete, formation des maitres, pratiques des formateurs In this article, we present the preliminary results of the first study on the implementa ‐ tion of the professional competency ‐ based approach in teacher education in Quebec. We gathered our data from 383 teacher educators using on ‐ line questionnaires. Our results show that 34.5 per cent of respondents had entirely or substantially changed their practices to adapt them to the requirements of the professional competency ‐ based approach. This study also gave us the opportunity to gather information about other concerns related to the professional competency ‐ based approach, such as the educators’ points of view on this approach, the training they received to use it, and their assessments of it. Key words: investigation, teacher education, practices of teacher educators

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducationSame topicEducational Practices and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207