Multiplication of stored-product mites on Canadian wheat and oilseed cultivars.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Two experiments were conducted to determine the infestation potential of wheat and oilseeds to stored-product mites. In the first experiment, 10 adults of either Acarus siro or Acarus farris were placed into ventilated glass vials containing whole or crushed seed of 1-3 cultivars of each of wheat, sunflower, flax, soyabean, rape, and mustard. After 15 weeks incubation at 20°C and 75% RH, populations were assessed. All wheat cultivars, both whole and crushed, were highly susceptible to Acarus siro and barely susceptible to Acarus farris, indicating a strong difference in the reproductive requirements of the two closely related species. On wheat, mean multiplication rates for Acarus siro ranged from 11× to 296× on whole cultivars of Neepawa and Glenlea, respectively, and from 617× to 862× on crushed cultivars of Glenlea and Columbus, respectively. This indicates that the seed coat of whole seed provides marginal protection to feeding larvae. Acarus farris multiplied only 6× on whole Glenlea wheat, with all other treatments failing to sustain the original population. Acarus farris did poorly on all the cultivars of both whole and crushed oilseeds; the only population to increase above the original numbers was on whole Sundak sunflower, which had a mean increase of 2.5×. Similarly, Acarus siro did not reproduce on crushed oilseeds but showed an increase of 646× on whole Sundak sunflower, 114× on whole Domo mustard and 83× on whole Linott flax. A second experiment of similar design was conducted to determine the infestation rate on Columbus and Neepawa hard red spring wheat by the two Acarus species and three additional species of stored-product mites, Aeroglyphus robustus, Lepidoglyphus destructor, and Tyrophagus putrescentiae. Crushed seed of both cultivars sustained high populations of Acarus siro and T. putrescentiae, which increased 1059-1202× and 974-1963×, respectively. Lepidoglyphus destructor increased 147× on crushed Columbus but for the most part L. destructor, Aeroglyphus robustus and Acarus farris populations remained at low levels, increasing not more than 2-27× on whole and crushed seed of both cultivars. It appears that the stored-product mites tested here can all survive on whole stored cereals and oilseeds to varying degrees, but special consideration should be given to stocks that become infested with Acarus siro and T. putrescentiae. These two species take best advantage of damaged cereals, where nutrients are readily available, resulting in large population increases. Conversely, the crushing of oilseeds appears to inhibit mite propagation, probably because of excessive oil content (45%, dry weight) within the meal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".