MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W348540338 · doi:10.1079/9780851996912.0402

Multiplication of stored-product mites on Canadian wheat and oilseed cultivars.

2003· book-chapter· en· W348540338 on OpenAlex
N. D. G. White, C. J. Demianyk, Digvir S. Jayas

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCABI eBooks · 2003
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Pest Control Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultivarBiologyPopulationSunflowerHorticultureToxicologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<title>Abstract</title> Two experiments were conducted to determine the infestation potential of wheat and oilseeds to stored-product mites. In the first experiment, 10 adults of either <italic>Acarus siro</italic> or <italic>Acarus farris</italic> were placed into ventilated glass vials containing whole or crushed seed of 1-3 cultivars of each of wheat, sunflower, flax, soyabean, rape, and mustard. After 15 weeks incubation at 20°C and 75% RH, populations were assessed. All wheat cultivars, both whole and crushed, were highly susceptible to <italic>Acarus siro</italic> and barely susceptible to <italic>Acarus farris</italic>, indicating a strong difference in the reproductive requirements of the two closely related species. On wheat, mean multiplication rates for <italic>Acarus siro</italic> ranged from 11× to 296× on whole cultivars of Neepawa and Glenlea, respectively, and from 617× to 862× on crushed cultivars of Glenlea and Columbus, respectively. This indicates that the seed coat of whole seed provides marginal protection to feeding larvae. <italic>Acarus farris</italic> multiplied only 6× on whole Glenlea wheat, with all other treatments failing to sustain the original population. <italic>Acarus farris</italic> did poorly on all the cultivars of both whole and crushed oilseeds; the only population to increase above the original numbers was on whole Sundak sunflower, which had a mean increase of 2.5×. Similarly, <italic>Acarus siro</italic> did not reproduce on crushed oilseeds but showed an increase of 646× on whole Sundak sunflower, 114× on whole Domo mustard and 83× on whole Linott flax. A second experiment of similar design was conducted to determine the infestation rate on Columbus and Neepawa hard red spring wheat by the two <italic>Acarus</italic> species and three additional species of stored-product mites, <italic>Aeroglyphus robustus, Lepidoglyphus destructor</italic>, and <italic>Tyrophagus putrescentiae</italic>. Crushed seed of both cultivars sustained high populations of <italic>Acarus siro</italic> and <italic>T. putrescentiae</italic>, which increased 1059-1202× and 974-1963×, respectively. <italic>Lepidoglyphus destructor</italic> increased 147× on crushed Columbus but for the most part <italic>L. destructor</italic>, <italic>Aeroglyphus robustus</italic> and <italic>Acarus farris</italic> populations remained at low levels, increasing not more than 2-27× on whole and crushed seed of both cultivars. It appears that the stored-product mites tested here can all survive on whole stored cereals and oilseeds to varying degrees, but special consideration should be given to stocks that become infested with <italic>Acarus siro</italic> and <italic>T. putrescentiae</italic>. These two species take best advantage of damaged cereals, where nutrients are readily available, resulting in large population increases. Conversely, the crushing of oilseeds appears to inhibit mite propagation, probably because of excessive oil content (45%, dry weight) within the meal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it