MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

C3a desArg/Acylation stimulating protein (ASP) and C5L2 correlation with expression of inflammatory factors and metabolic factors in human adipose tissue (94.25)

2007· article· en· W34948168 on OpenAlexaff
Katherine Cianflone, Huiling Lu, Robin MacLaren, Jessica Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdipose tissueLipid metabolismInternal medicineReceptorEndocrinologyImmune systemCD36ChemistryInflammationLipid profileBiologyMedicineImmunologyDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract C5L2 is a recently identified receptor for C5a and C3a/C3adesArg (ASP). C5a/C5adesArg binds C5L2 with high affinity but no functional activation. By contrast, C5L2 is a functional receptor for ASP and in adipocytes plays a role in lipid metabolism. In this study, we used adipose tissue microarray analysis to explore the overlap between metabolism and immunology. Subcutaneous (SC AT) and omental (OM AT) adipose tissue were collected from 14 subjects (normal + obese) and divided into two groups based on plasma ASP level (assayed by ELISA): high ASP group (↑ASP) (ASP>40nM) and low ASP group (↓ASP ) (ASP<40 nM). C5L2 (p=0.06), C5aR (p=0.03), IL-6 (p=0.01), and IL-6R (p=0.03) expression were increased significantly in ↑ ASP vs. ↓ASP in OM AT, with no change in SC AT. Plasma ASP correlated with lipid metabolic factors GPAT-1, FABP1, FABP5, FABP7 and adipophilin, and inflammatory factors CRP, C5aR and IL-6R in OM AT. ASP was mainly correlated with lipid metabolic factors, such as LPL, CD36, FABP3, and FABP6 in SC AT. ASP-C5L2 may play a role in mediating metabolic- immune interactions in adipose tissue. Funding: CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityFrench-language works237,207