MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W349591288

Ian Taylor Remembered

2001· article· en· W349591288 on OpenAlex
Jock Young

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Justice A Journal of Crime Conflict & World Order · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCrime, Deviance, and Social Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsPostmodernismSociologyCriminologyOrder (exchange)LawDemocracyMedia studiesPolitical scienceArtLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IAN TAYLOR WAS A KEY FIGURE IN THE POLITICALLY COMMITTED SOCIOLOGY THAT emerged in the 1960s. Radicalized, like so many intellectuals of his generation by the political flux of the time, he worked prolifically in the fields of criminology, politics, urban studies, sport, and popular culture. He was a polymath: he wrote on a wide array of subjects: soccer hooliganism, gun control, the Hillisborough disaster, glam rock, and money laundering among them; his most recent work included an article and consultancy on the Italian village planned in Manchester and his last piece, written from his hospital bed for the Times Literary Supplement, was on Canadian populism and the common sense revolution. It is perhaps as a criminologist that he was best known. He was a founding member of the National Deviancy Symposium, that irreverent, anarchistic bunch of sociologists who got together in the late 1960s, rehearsing many of the themes and controversies later to be associated with postmodernism and revolutionizing criminology out of recognition. In 1973, he co-authored The New Criminology, which remains in print today, and in 1981, while a lecturer at Sheffield University, he published Law and Order: Arguments for Socialism, which forcefully argued the need for parties of the Left to take seriously the problems of crime, prefiguring much of the present shift in policy and debate. In the 1980s, while working in Canada, he began to develop a criminology that firmly rooted the problem of crime within the wider political economy -- a position that became the hallmark of his later work. But his interests were not solely theoretical. In recent years, following the Dunblane massacre, he became active both politicall y and as a researcher in the campaign to control gun ownership. Numerous packages containing bullets, used syringes, and decaying meat arrived at his address at Salford University. Ian was unperturbed and suggested to the police that it was obviously from a distraught member of the gun lobby. They, for their part, with characteristic aplomb asked whether he had thought of the possibility that the packages might emanate from a disgruntled colleagues or perhaps his wife! The police eventually came round to his point of view, intercepting and searching all his mail and finally arresting the irate gun enthusiast. Ian Taylor's latest book, and to my mind the best, is Crime in Context, published in 1999. In this he traces not only how market societies generate crime, but also how crime itself can be seen as operating as a marketplace. The book received widespread critical acclaim and was awarded the prestigious Michael J. Hindelang award of the American Society of Criminology. Ian Taylor was born in 1944 in Sheffield and educated at the Universities of Durham and Cambridge, returning to Durham to complete his Ph. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it