Генерального штаба генерал-майор М. Е. Солнышкин: от храбого Терского казака и «Мятежника-корниловца» к добросовестному служаке в провинциальных штабах Красной армии. 1914-1924 гг.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Generation of Russian citizens, to whom happened to live in the first quarter of the last century, had a chance to experience the serious social upheaval from World War I to crush all the old European order to the deep inner “Troubles”, poured out in a fratricidal Civil War (1917-1920). People just worn on the shoulders of officers’ epaulettes, had to contemplate not only the whole social cataclysm, but also actively participate in it. Our article is devoted to a biography of the Terek Cossack Mikhail Efimovich Solnyshkina. The record of M. Solnyshkina for 1914-1924 years safely aligned heroism during World War (1914-1917), service in the Russian “revolutionary” Army (February October 1917), participated in the “Kornilov`s affair” in Summer 1917, participate in the “anti-Soviet” mutiny Cossack Ataman P. Krasnov in October 1917. Both of these “initiatives” have ended in complete failure. M. E. Solnyshkin did not shoot as the General Staff Lieutenant-General A. M. Crymov and not been briefly detained like Don Ataman P. N. Krasnov. In contrast, less than six months, counting from December 17, 1917, when our “genshtabist” is becoming available to the commander of the Caucasian Front, Solnyshkin was on service in the “provincial” military districts of the Red Army. And he served there “faithfully”, as well as on the “red” Southern front and in various military schools of the Red Army in the first half of the 1920s.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".