MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W35266688 · doi:10.1021/acsami.1c23931

Fernando Amor y Mayor (1823?-1863), nuevos datos para su biografía y análisis de las aportaciones geológicas de su obra

2012· article· en· W35266688 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Antonio Perejón

Bibliographic record

VenueBoletín de la Real Sociedad Española de Historia Natural. Sección geológica · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeological and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

n la primera parte de este trabajo se exponen nuevos datos sobre la vida y la obra de Fernando Amor y Mayor, obtenidos tras la investigación realizada en diversos archivos e instituciones. Se proponen nuevas interpretaciones sobre el desarrollo de su vida académica, se discuten algunas opiniones expresadas por anteriores biógrafos y se presentan documentos inéditos que aclaran el lugar donde en la actualidad reposan sus restos mortales. En la segunda parte de este trabajo se analizan las aportaciones geológicas y paleontológicas de Fernando Amor, fruto de sus recorridos como naturalista por la provincia de Córdoba, durante los años que fue catedrático de Historia Natural del Instituto, de su viaje a Marruecos realizado en 1859 y de las labores geológicas llevadas a cabo como miembro de la Comisión Científica del Pacífico, entre 1862 y 1863, así como de su actividad como recolector de objetos naturales. También se pone de relieve su colaboración con los geólogos franceses que en la segunda mitad del siglo XIX realizaban trabajos en España, a los que acompañó en diversas ocasiones durante sus estudios por la provincia de Córdoba, y como experto conocedor del terreno les facilitó datos de gran relieve paleontológico y estratigráfico.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBoletín de la Real Sociedad Española de Historia Natural. Sección geológicaSame topicArchaeological and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207