Linking diagenesis to sequence stratigraphy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Preface vii Linking diagenesis to sequence stratigraphy: an integrated tool for understanding and predicting reservoir quality distribution 1 S. MORAD, J.M. KETZER and L.F. DE ROS The occurrence of glaucony in the stratigraphic record: distribution patterns and sequence-stratigraphic significance 37 ALESSANDRO AMOROSI Sequence architecture and palaeoclimate controls on diagenesis related to subaerial exposure of icehouse cyclic Pennsylvanian and Permian carbonates 55 GOVERT J.A. BUIJS and ROBERT H. GOLDSTEIN Sequence stratigraphic influence on regional diagenesis of a mixed carbonate-siliciclastic passive margin, Eocene, N.C., USA 81 BRIAN P. COFFEY Stratigraphic controls on the distribution of diagenetic processes, quality and heterogeneity of fluvial-aeolian reservoirs from the Reconcavo Basin, Brazil 105 LUIZ FERNANDO DE ROS and CLAITON M. S. SCHERER Diagenesis at exposure surfaces in a transgressive systems tract in a third order sequence (Lower Carboniferous, Belgium) 133 A. SMEESTER, P MUCHEZ, R. SWENNEN and E. KEPPENS Diagenetic and epigenetic mineralization in Central Europe related to surfaces and depositional systems of sequence stratigraphic relevance 151 HARALD DILL Distribution and petrography of concretionary carbonate in a falling-stage delta-front sandstone succession: Upper Cretaceous Panther Tongue Member, Book Cliffs, Utah 183 PHILIP G. MACHENT, KEVIN G. TAYLOR, JOE H.S. MACQUAKER and JIM D. MARSHALL Dolomite-rich Condensed Sections in Overbank Deposits of Turbidite Channels: the Eocene Hecho Group, south-central Pyrenees, Spain 207 R. MARFIL, H. MANSURBEG, D. GARCIA, M.A. CAJA, E. REMACHA, S. MORAD, A. AMOROSI and J-P. NYSTUEN An integrated stratigraphic, petrophysical, geochemical and geostatistical approach to the understanding of burial diagenesis: Triassic Sherwood Sandstone Group, South Yorkshire, UK 231 J.M. MCKINLEY, A.H. RUFFELL and R.H WORDEN Geochemical evidence for meteoric diagenesis and cryptic surfaces of subaerial exposure in Upper Ordovician peritidal carbonates from the Nashville Dome, central Tennessee, U.S.A. 257 L. BRUCE RAILSBACK, KAREN M. LAYOU, NOEL A. HEIM, STEVEN M. HOLLAND, M.L. TROGDON, M.B. JARRETT, GABRIEL M. IZSAK, DANIEL E. BULGER, ERIC J. WYSONG, KENTON J. TRUBEE, J.M. FISER, JULIA E. COX and DOUGLAS E. CROWE Distribution of Diagenetic Alterations in Relationship to Depositional Facies and Sequence Stratigraphy of Wave- and Tide-Dominated Siliciclastic Shoreline Complex: Upper Cretaceous Chimney Rock Sandstones, Wyoming and Utah, USA 271 KHALID AL-RAMADAN, SADOON MORAD and PIRET PLINK-BJORKLUND Linking Diagenesis and Porosity Preservation vs. Destruction to Sequence Stratigraphy of Gas Condensate Reservoir Sandstones, the Jauf Formation (Lower to Middle Devonian), Eastern Saudi Arabia. 297 KHALID AL-RAMADAN, SADOON MORAD, A. KENT NORTON and MICHAEL HULVER Petrographic, stable isotope and fluid inclusion characteristics of the Viking sandstones: implications for sequence stratigraphy, Bayhurst area, SW Saskatchewan, Canada 337 C. WALZ, G. CHI and P.K. PEDERSEN Diagenetic alterations related to falling stage and lowstand systems tracts of shelf, slope and basin floor sandstones (Eocene Central Basin, Spitsbergen) 353 H. MANSURBEG, S. MORAD, P. PLINK-BJORKLUND, M.A.K. El-GHALI, M.A. CAJA and R. MARFIL Diagenetic controls on porosity preservation in lowstand oolitic and crinoidal carbonates, Mississippian, Kansas and Missouri, USA 379 MATTHEW E. RITTER and ROBERT H. GOLDSTEIN Diagenetic Salinity Cycles: A link between carbonate diagenesis and sequence stratigraphy 407 A.E. CSOMA and R. H. GOLDSTEIN Linkages between tapho-diagenesis and sequence stratigraphy in cool-water limestones from a Pliocene forearc seaway, New Zealand 445 VINCENT CARON, CAMPBELL S. NELSON and PETER J. J. KAMP Recognition and significance of paludal dolomites: Late Mississippian, Kentucky, USA 477 A.J. BARNETT, V. P. WRIGHT and S.F. CROWLEY Index 501
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".