Las competiciones olímpicas en el origen de la igualdad entre hombres y mujeres: la opinión de Myrtle Cook, periodista de Montreal, 1929-1960
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Myrtle Cook fue medallista de oro de atletismo en los Juegos Olímpicos de Amsterdam en 1928, miembro fundadora de asociaciones deportivas femeninas, entrenadora y periodista, Myrtle Cook (1902-1985) dedicó su vida al deporte femenino. Este trabajo trata sobre su carrera periodística que se desarrolló entre 1929 y 1960. Específicamente se centra en la manera en la que utilizó sus crónicas para hacer valer sus ideas sobre la participación de las mujeres en el deporte, es decir en la superación de las deportistas que participaban en las competiciones de alto nivel, sobre todo en los Juegos Olímpicos.Palabras clave: Juegos Olímpicos, Myrtle Cook. OLYMPIC COMPETITIONS AT THE START OF MEN AND WOMEN EQUALITY. THE VIEW OF A 1929-1960 MONTREAL JOURNALIST: MYRTLE COOK Myrtle Cook was an athletics gold medal winner in the Amsterdam Olympic Games 1928, founder member of women sport associations, trainer and journalist. Myrtle Cook (1929-1985) devoted her life to women sport. This paper deals with her career as a journalist which spanned from 1929 till 1960. It particularly focuses on the use she made of her reports to assert her own ideas on the participation of women in sport, that is to say, the strive of sport women who participated in high-performance sporting competitions, mainly in Olympic Games.Key words: Olympic Games, Myrtle Cook.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".