MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W355165949

IMPROVING WORK ZONE SAFETY THROUGH ENHANCED TEMPORARY CONDITIONS

2002· article· en· W355165949 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G Junnor, Am Khan, S Aurini

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSafety and Risk Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)TollTransport engineeringThe InternetWarning systemWork zoneIncident managementEngineeringComputer scienceBusinessRisk analysis (engineering)Computer securityTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the greatest operational challenges for road authorities and contractors is keeping an existing, busy highway corridor open to traffic during maintenance, rehabilitation, reconstruction, or expansion activities. Most recently, the application of human factors knowledge and positive guidance technique to work zone safety and efficiency issues has highlighted the substantial benefits of providing adequate advance warning and directional guidance to drivers approaching work zones. Experience has shown that commuter routes benefit substantially from advance notification. On Ontario's provincial highway network, an enhanced, adaptive system of temporary conditions signing, encompassing advance notification, advance warning and alternative route information, has traditionally been employed in conjunction with large, long-duration or otherwise intrusive projects. Under this scheme, the provision of temporary conditions traffic management (TCTM) information has grown from simple Construction Ahead signing to a complex system of static and dynamic messaging on the affected roadway, and on intersecting roads and parallel routes, complimented by media advisories, toll-free and Internet road information services, and up-to-the-minute traffic reports by media outlets. In the late 1990's a TCTM Manual was commissioned. Initial experiences amongst the consultants, contractors and ministry staff with the Manual have resulted in a number of Lessons Learned, which are outlined in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSafety and Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207